Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 500-490 Topic 1 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-490 exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 1
[All 500-490 Questions]

Which are two advantages of a ''one switch at a time'' approach to integrating SD-Access into an existing brownfield environment? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Bettyann
4 months ago
Protecting recent investments and simplified testing? That's like getting the best of both worlds. It's like having your cake and eating it too... Wait, can you eat cake and test networking gear at the same time? Hmm, food for thought.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
4 months ago
Ah, the old 'one switch at a time' approach. It's like the tortoise and the hare, but with more networking gear. Slow and steady wins the race, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
5 months ago
D and F all the way, baby! Simplified rollback and testing? Heck yeah, that's the kind of thing that makes my IT heart flutter.
upvoted 0 times
Nickie
3 months ago
Yeah, it definitely makes the process smoother and less risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
3 months ago
It's great to hear that the 'one switch at a time' approach offers simplified rollback and testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
4 months ago
I agree, those advantages are really important when integrating SD-Access into an existing environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
4 months ago
D and F are definitely the way to go. Simplified rollback and testing are key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Allene
5 months ago
Ooh, 'one switch at a time' and simplified testing? Sign me up! I don't know about you, but I'm all about reducing risk. Less stress, more success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
5 months ago
Option B is spot on. Gotta protect those recent investments, am I right? The 'one switch at a time' approach seems like the perfect way to do that.
upvoted 0 times
Lang
3 months ago
F) allows simplified testing prior to cutover
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
3 months ago
Yes, protecting investments is crucial. The 'one switch at a time' approach sounds like a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azzie
3 months ago
B) ideal for protecting recent investments while upgrading legacy hardware
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
4 months ago
A) appropriate for campus and remote site environments
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
4 months ago
Gerald: That's true. The 'one switch at a time' approach seems like a smart way to go about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
4 months ago
User Comment: I agree. It's crucial to upgrade without losing what we already have.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
4 months ago
Option B is definitely important. We don't want to waste recent investments.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilford
5 months ago
I think the 'one switch at a time' approach is the way to go. It's the safest option and allows us to test things out before fully committing. Plus, who doesn't love a good old-fashioned rollback?
upvoted 0 times
Jame
4 months ago
F) allows simplified testing prior to cutover
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
4 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
4 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
4 months ago
Yes, I agree. It's important to minimize risk and have a safety net in case something goes wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgilio
5 months ago
D) allows simplified roll back
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
5 months ago
A) appropriate for campus and remote site environments
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catina
6 months ago
I believe option F is also important. Simplified testing before cutover can help prevent any major issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
6 months ago
I agree with Caren. Upgrading legacy hardware can be costly, so it's important to protect investments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caren
6 months ago
I think option B is a good advantage because it helps protect recent investments.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77