17 hours, huh? Sounds pretty specific. Maybe Cisco's been timing their own incident response and wants to see if we're as quick on the draw. Either way, I'm not taking any chances - I'm picking the fastest option.
Ah, so we've got a few optimists in the group, I see. While I appreciate the enthusiasm, I'm not convinced that 4 hours is realistic. I'm gonna have to go with C) 3 days. It's just a safer bet, you know? Better to underpromise and overdeliver than the other way around.
I'm gonna have to go with option C on this one. 3 days sounds about right - just enough time for the IT team to scramble and look like heroes when they save the day at the last minute.
Hmm, 48 hours seems a bit too relaxed for a security threat, don't you think? I'd go with something more snappy, like 4 hours. Gotta be on your toes, you know?
17 hours, huh? Well, I don't know about you, but I'm not feeling very prime about that answer. I'm sticking with B) 4 hours. I mean, come on, Cisco's gotta be able to detect threats faster than that, right? Otherwise, what are we paying them the big bucks for?
Whoa, this question is like a ticking time bomb! I bet Cisco wants us to diffuse it in a matter of hours, not days. Maybe they're testing our security response time reflexes.
You guys are all missing the mark. I bet it's D) 17 hours. Why? Because 17 is a prime number, and everyone knows prime numbers are the key to solving all of life's mysteries. Trust me, I'm an expert. (Or at least I hope to be after this exam!)
Hah, 3 days? That's practically an eternity in the world of cybersecurity! I'm going to have to disagree with you there, my friend. I think A) 48 hours is a more accurate estimate. Cisco's got some serious security chops, so they're not messing around when it comes to threat detection.
I don't know, 4 hours seems a bit too fast. Cybersecurity threats can be pretty complex these days. I'm thinking C) 3 days might be a more realistic timeframe. It takes time to detect and analyze these threats, you know?
Hmm, this seems like a pretty straightforward question. Cisco is known for its security solutions, so I'd expect the time to detection to be relatively quick. Let's see, I'm going to go with B) 4 hours. That seems like a reasonable estimate for a company of Cisco's caliber.
Eun
6 months agoKristeen
6 months agoMicaela
6 months agoEric
7 months agoDorothy
8 months agoYasuko
8 months agoCeleste
8 months agoLino
8 months agoBeckie
8 months agoSharee
8 months agoDiane
8 months agoTresa
6 months agoLenna
6 months agoDominga
6 months agoSunny
7 months agoBrittani
8 months agoMerilyn
8 months agoLuke
8 months agoBethanie
7 months agoLanie
8 months agoPaulina
8 months agoKrystal
8 months agoLeslee
8 months agoJosphine
8 months agoUlysses
8 months ago