Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco Exam 700-150 Topic 2 Question 85 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 700-150 exam
Question #: 85
Topic #: 2
[All 700-150 Questions]

How long is the average "time to detection" of a security threat for Cisco's customers?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Eun
4 months ago
I think it's 3 days, based on some case studies I've seen.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
4 months ago
I remember reading somewhere that it's 48 hours.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's 17 hours.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
5 months ago
I think the average time to detection is 4 hours.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
6 months ago
17 hours, huh? Sounds pretty specific. Maybe Cisco's been timing their own incident response and wants to see if we're as quick on the draw. Either way, I'm not taking any chances - I'm picking the fastest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
6 months ago
Ah, so we've got a few optimists in the group, I see. While I appreciate the enthusiasm, I'm not convinced that 4 hours is realistic. I'm gonna have to go with C) 3 days. It's just a safer bet, you know? Better to underpromise and overdeliver than the other way around.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
6 months ago
I'm gonna have to go with option C on this one. 3 days sounds about right - just enough time for the IT team to scramble and look like heroes when they save the day at the last minute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lino
6 months ago
Hmm, 48 hours seems a bit too relaxed for a security threat, don't you think? I'd go with something more snappy, like 4 hours. Gotta be on your toes, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
6 months ago
17 hours, huh? Well, I don't know about you, but I'm not feeling very prime about that answer. I'm sticking with B) 4 hours. I mean, come on, Cisco's gotta be able to detect threats faster than that, right? Otherwise, what are we paying them the big bucks for?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
6 months ago
Whoa, this question is like a ticking time bomb! I bet Cisco wants us to diffuse it in a matter of hours, not days. Maybe they're testing our security response time reflexes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
6 months ago
You guys are all missing the mark. I bet it's D) 17 hours. Why? Because 17 is a prime number, and everyone knows prime numbers are the key to solving all of life's mysteries. Trust me, I'm an expert. (Or at least I hope to be after this exam!)
upvoted 0 times
Tresa
4 months ago
I'm with the original commenter on this one. D) 17 hours sounds right to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
4 months ago
Actually, I think it's C) 3 days. Sometimes threats can go undetected for longer periods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
4 months ago
I disagree. I believe it's B) 4 hours. Quick detection is crucial in cybersecurity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunny
4 months ago
Well, I think it's A) 48 hours. That seems like a reasonable timeframe for detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brittani
6 months ago
Hah, 3 days? That's practically an eternity in the world of cybersecurity! I'm going to have to disagree with you there, my friend. I think A) 48 hours is a more accurate estimate. Cisco's got some serious security chops, so they're not messing around when it comes to threat detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
6 months ago
I don't know, 4 hours seems a bit too fast. Cybersecurity threats can be pretty complex these days. I'm thinking C) 3 days might be a more realistic timeframe. It takes time to detect and analyze these threats, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Luke
6 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a pretty straightforward question. Cisco is known for its security solutions, so I'd expect the time to detection to be relatively quick. Let's see, I'm going to go with B) 4 hours. That seems like a reasonable estimate for a company of Cisco's caliber.
upvoted 0 times
Bethanie
5 months ago
Agreed, quick detection is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
5 months ago
4 hours is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
5 months ago
3 days would be too slow for a company like Cisco.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
5 months ago
17 hours is still quite quick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
5 months ago
48 hours seems too long.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
5 months ago
I agree, seems like a reasonable estimate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
5 months ago
I think it's 4 hours.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77