Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 700-905 Topic 1 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 700-905 exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 1
[All 700-905 Questions]

Which two processes does failure on a node initiate? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, E


by Leanora at Aug 05, 2024, 10:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 700-905 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Sheridan
3 months ago
B and D seem like the obvious choices here. Although, I do wonder what kind of genius came up with option E. 'Mark it unhealthy but let it keep running'? Yeah, that'll end well.
upvoted 0 times
Paulina
2 months ago
D) The VMs on the failed node are moved to another node by vSphere high availability
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
3 months ago
B) Affected node is marked as unhealthy and placed into standby mode
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fletcher
3 months ago
I believe it's A and D, because data migration and VM movement are crucial in case of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
4 months ago
Ha! I bet the person who wrote option E has never actually worked with a real system before. That's just asking for trouble. I'm going with B and D - quarantine the node and move those VMs, no question.
upvoted 0 times
Brandee
3 months ago
Yeah, B and D seem like the best course of action in case of node failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
3 months ago
I think B is definitely necessary to isolate the affected node. D is a good way to keep things running smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
3 months ago
Option E does seem risky, I agree. B and D sound like the safer choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anjelica
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about E. Marking the system as unhealthy but keeping it running seems like a recipe for disaster. I'd go with B and C - the failed node should be isolated and the issue reported.
upvoted 0 times
Rosendo
2 months ago
Definitely, isolating the failed node and reporting the issue are crucial steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilbert
2 months ago
Yeah, marking the system as unhealthy but keeping it running doesn't sound like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
3 months ago
I agree, C is also important - the failure needs to be reported to TAC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanice
3 months ago
I think B is correct, the node should be marked as unhealthy and put into standby mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malissa
4 months ago
I'm not sure, I think it could be C and E.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
4 months ago
I agree with Jeffrey. B and D are the correct answers. The system can't just remain operational with a failed node - that would be disastrous!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeffrey
4 months ago
B and D for sure. The failed node needs to be marked unhealthy and the VMs need to be moved to another node to maintain availability.
upvoted 0 times
Stephen
3 months ago
That's correct! Those are the two processes initiated when a node fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
4 months ago
D) The VMs on the failed node are moved to another node by vSphere high availability
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
4 months ago
B) Affected node is marked as unhealthy and placed into standby mode
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catalina
4 months ago
I agree with Lou, B and D make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
4 months ago
I think it's B and D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77