Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Citrix Exam 1Y0-440 Topic 2 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-440 exam

Question #: 61
Topic #: 2

[All 1Y0-440 Questions]

Scenario: A Citrix Architect needs to assess an existing on-premises NetScaler deployment which includes Advanced Endpoint Analysis scans. During a previous security audit, the team discovered that certain endpoint devices were able to perform unauthorized actions despite NOT meeting pre-established criteria.

The issue was isolated to several endpoint analysis (EPA) scan settings.

Click the Exhibit button to view the endpoint security requirements and configured EPA policy settings.

Which setting is preventing the security requirements of the organization from being met?

AItem 6

BItem 7

CItem 1

DItem 3

EItem 5

FItem 2

GItem 4

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: E

by Judy at Jun 20, 2024, 11:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Y0-440 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Buck

5 months ago

I don't know about you guys, but I'm just hoping the correct answer isn't 'Item 0' - that would be a real face-palm moment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcolm

5 months ago

Wait, wait, wait... Is this a trick question? What if the answer is 'All of the above'?

upvoted 0 times

Marvel

4 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think it might be Item 1.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quentin

4 months ago

I'm going with Item 3.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shenika

4 months ago

No, I believe it's Item 4.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alona

5 months ago

I think the answer is Item 2.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Daren

5 months ago

I agree with Anastacia, Item 4 looks like the culprit based on the configured settings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anastacia

5 months ago

But Item 4 seems to have conflicting settings, which could be the root cause.

upvoted 0 times

...

Van

5 months ago

I disagree, I believe it's Item 2 causing the problem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aide

5 months ago

Item 2, for sure. Who would ever configure that setting correctly? It's like a security landmine.

upvoted 0 times

Stacey

4 months ago

Yeah, I agree. It's definitely causing the security issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dean

4 months ago

I think it's Item 2, it seems like a risky setting.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Anastacia

6 months ago

I think the issue might be with Item 4.

upvoted 0 times

...

Whitney

6 months ago

Aha! I bet it's Item 4. That one sounds like it could be the culprit.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alayna

6 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm going to have to really analyze those EPA policy settings carefully to figure this out.

upvoted 0 times

Shawn

5 months ago

I agree, let's carefully analyze that setting to see if it's preventing the security requirements from being met.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latosha

5 months ago

I think we need to focus on Item 2 in the EPA policy settings.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77