Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Citrix Exam 1Y0-440 Topic 4 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-440 exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 4
[All 1Y0-440 Questions]

Scenario: A Citrix Architect needs to design a new solution within Amazon Web Services (AWS) The architect would like to create a high availability Citrix ADC VPX pair to provide load balancing for applications hosted in the AWS deployment within a single availability zone which will receive traffic arriving from the Internet.

Which configuration should the architect choose to accomplish this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Evangelina
4 months ago
I wonder if the architect considered using a Citrix ADC instance as a giant bouncy castle to handle all the traffic? That would be a high-availability solution, alright!
upvoted 0 times
...
Theresia
4 months ago
Option E? More like 'Option Eek!' Configuring a high availability pair with two separate CloudFormation templates sounds like a recipe for disaster. I'll pass on that one.
upvoted 0 times
Karan
3 months ago
Let's go with Option B instead. Using a Citrix CloudFormation template for an Active-Passive high availability pair seems like a safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
3 months ago
I agree, Option E does sound risky. We should consider a more reliable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thad
4 months ago
I think option C could work too, deploying as an Active-Passive pair might be simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leeann
4 months ago
I'm not sure, option D also sounds like a viable solution for load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
4 months ago
I agree with Franchesca, option B seems like the best choice for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
4 months ago
Hmm, Option D with the AWS Elastic Load Balancing seems like a clever way to distribute the traffic. Might be worth considering if I'm not comfortable with the Citrix-specific options.
upvoted 0 times
Florinda
3 months ago
True, Option B does seem like a simpler way to set up the high availability pair. It's always good to have different options to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
4 months ago
But Option B with the Citrix ADC AWS-VPX Cluster using a Citrix CloudFormation template seems like a more straightforward solution for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
4 months ago
I agree, using AWS Elastic Load Balancing can be a good alternative if you're not familiar with Citrix-specific options.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fannie
4 months ago
I'm not too familiar with Citrix ADC on AWS, but Option C looks like a good choice to create an Active-Passive pair. I'd need to double-check the details, though.
upvoted 0 times
Erinn
3 months ago
Definitely, using Active-Passive configuration can help ensure continuous availability for the applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Henriette
4 months ago
It's important to ensure high availability for load balancing in AWS, so Option C sounds like a solid plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
4 months ago
I agree, setting up two standalone instances and deploying them as Active-Passive seems like a reliable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desire
4 months ago
Option C looks like a good choice to create an Active-Passive pair.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Franchesca
5 months ago
I think the architect should choose option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
5 months ago
Option B seems like the most straightforward way to set up a high availability Citrix ADC pair in AWS. Using the CloudFormation template should make the deployment process a lot easier.
upvoted 0 times
Mary
4 months ago
That sounds like a good choice. The CloudFormation template should simplify the setup process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
4 months ago
B) A Citrix ADC AWS-VPX Cluster using a Citrix CloudFormation template in the AWS marketplace, then deploy it to create an Active-Passive high availability pair
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77