Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Citrix Exam 1Y0-440 Topic 6 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-440 exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 6
[All 1Y0-440 Questions]

Scenario: A Citrix Architect needs to assess an existing on-premises NetScaler deployment which includes Advanced Endpoint Analysis scans. During a previous security audit, the team discovered that certain endpoint devices were able to perform unauthorized actions despite NOT meeting pre-established criteria.

The issue was isolated to several endpoint analysis (EPA) scan settings.

Click the Exhibit button to view the endpoint security requirements and configured EPA policy settings.

Which setting is preventing the security requirements of the organization from being met?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: E

by Angelica at Aug 07, 2024, 12:58 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Y0-440 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Alica
3 months ago
I agree with Hubert, Item 4 looks like the culprit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
3 months ago
But Item 4 seems to have conflicting criteria, which could be the root cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
4 months ago
Item 1 seems like the odd one out. I bet the Architect is kicking themselves for this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldine
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's Item 2 that's the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
4 months ago
Haha, Item 3 is the obvious answer. These Citrix guys must be living in the past or something.
upvoted 0 times
Christoper
3 months ago
Yeah, it seems like a pretty big oversight on their part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
3 months ago
I agree, Item 3 is definitely the culprit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cyril
4 months ago
I'm going with Item 2. It's the only one that doesn't match the security requirements. Rookie mistake!
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
4 months ago
Item 4 is definitely the culprit here. How could they have missed that?
upvoted 0 times
Aleta
3 months ago
We need to address this issue as soon as possible to ensure security compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
3 months ago
It's surprising that such a critical setting was overlooked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
4 months ago
I agree, Item 4 seems to be the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hubert
4 months ago
I think it might be Item 4 causing the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77