Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CompTIA Exam DA0-001 Topic 3 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's DA0-001 exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 3
[All DA0-001 Questions]

Which of the following is a best practice when updating a legacy data source?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Kimberlie at Apr 11, 2024, 09:00 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DA0-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Alica
5 months ago
I think it ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the organization and the data being updated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
5 months ago
Placing old data in new fields can also be helpful for archiving purposes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
6 months ago
I disagree, removing the data source from production could lead to loss of important historical data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johana
6 months ago
I believe keeping only the most recent data is also important to avoid clutter and confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Grover
6 months ago
I agree, having a codebook would help ensure that the legacy data source is updated correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
6 months ago
I think the best practice is to create a codebook to document field changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
6 months ago
I think keeping only the most recent data is also important to avoid clutter and confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
6 months ago
I think removing the data source from production is not the best option. We might still need historical data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
7 months ago
I agree with Jerlene. It's important to keep track of changes for reference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
7 months ago
I think the best practice is to create a codebook to document field changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellen
8 months ago
Ooh, I like the sound of option C - creating a codebook to document field changes. That's a great way to ensure transparency and make it easier to understand the data over time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrina
8 months ago
You know, I'm kind of surprised that 'removing the data source from production' is even an option. That's like going nuclear on the problem! Let's keep things sane and go with the codebook approach.
upvoted 0 times
Julio
6 months ago
Yeah, it helps to keep track of what changes are being made.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
7 months ago
I agree, creating a codebook is a good way to document changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dannie
8 months ago
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. Option B, keeping only the most recent data, also doesn't seem like a great idea. We could be losing valuable historical information that way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latricia
8 months ago
Haha, I can already picture the frantic emails and Slack messages if we removed the data source from production. 'Guys, where did all our data go?!' That's a hard pass from me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
8 months ago
I agree. Removing the data source from production (option D) seems like a drastic measure that could cause major disruptions. That's definitely not a best practice in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
8 months ago
Exactly, Candida! Keeping the historical data is crucial, and the codebook will be a lifesaver. I can just imagine the chaos if we started deleting old data. 'Wait, where did that crucial piece of information go?' Nope, not for me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
8 months ago
This question seems to be testing our understanding of best practices when updating legacy data sources. I think the key here is to maintain data integrity and traceability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
8 months ago
Placing old data in new fields? That just sounds like a recipe for confusion. And keeping only the most recent data? What if we need to reference historical information? Nah, the codebook is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
8 months ago
I agree, the codebook option seems like the most thorough approach. Plus, it'll make it easier for future developers to understand the data and its history. I'm not a fan of just removing the data source from production - that feels like we're sweeping the problem under the rug.
upvoted 0 times
In
8 months ago
C) Creating a codebook to document field changes
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
8 months ago
B) Keeping only the most recent data
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
8 months ago
A) Placing old data in new fields
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
8 months ago
C) Creating a codebook to document field changes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brianne
8 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. Updating legacy data sources can be a real headache, but I think creating a codebook to document field changes is definitely the way to go. That way, we can keep track of what's changing and ensure consistency across the system.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77