Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CompTIA Exam FC0-U61 Topic 3 Question 69 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's FC0-U61 exam
Question #: 69
Topic #: 3
[All FC0-U61 Questions]

Which of the following license types would be most cost effective for an organization if all users need to access software but not on a consistent basis?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

A concurrent license would be most cost-effective for an organization where all users need access to software but not at the same time. Concurrent licenses allow a certain number of users to access the software simultaneously, regardless of who those users are. This type of licensing is efficient and economical for environments with variable software usage patterns. Reference: Licensing models and their applications are discussed in CompTIA IT Fundamentals, which includes various types of software licenses and their suitability for different organizational needs.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lemuel
2 months ago
Dude, the Single-use license is where it's at! Just buy a license for each user who needs it. Simple, straightforward, and no worrying about that pesky 'concurrent' thing. Plus, it's like having your own personal copy of the software. Kinda like having your own personal genie, but without the whole 'three wishes' thing.
upvoted 0 times
Arlen
20 days ago
D) Device
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
28 days ago
C) Concurrent
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
1 months ago
B) Single-use
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 months ago
A) Site
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sunshine
2 months ago
Ooh, I'm feeling the Device license. That way, each user can have their own dedicated device to use the software on. No more fighting over who gets to use it, am I right? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
Edmond
23 days ago
User 3: I agree with Edmond, the Device license would definitely solve any sharing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
1 months ago
User 2: I see your point, but I still think the Device license is the way to go. Each user having their own device sounds convenient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
1 months ago
User 1: I think the Site license would be more cost effective. It allows unlimited users to access the software.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leslie
2 months ago
I see your point, Candra. Concurrent does seem like a good option for organizations with fluctuating software usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
2 months ago
Haha, yeah, the Device license does sound like a personal genie. But I think I'd rather have the whole organization using the Site license and just sharing the wealth, you know? No need for any 'me-first' attitudes here.
upvoted 0 times
Bethanie
1 months ago
Definitely, no need for any 'me-first' attitudes with that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunny
2 months ago
I think the Site license promotes teamwork and collaboration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
2 months ago
Yeah, it would definitely be more cost effective for the organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
2 months ago
I agree, the Site license seems like the best option for sharing resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Essie
3 months ago
Definitely go for the Concurrent license. It's the most flexible and cost-effective option if users don't need constant access. Just gotta make sure not to exceed the maximum number of concurrent users, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Jin
1 months ago
Just need to keep an eye on those concurrent user limits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
1 months ago
Yeah, it's great for organizations with fluctuating software usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
2 months ago
Concurrent license is the way to go for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martha
2 months ago
Concurrent license can save a lot of money in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dante
2 months ago
Just need to keep an eye on the number of users accessing at the same time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
2 months ago
Yeah, it's great for organizations with fluctuating software usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
2 months ago
Concurrent license is the way to go for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candra
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe Concurrent would be more cost effective because it allows multiple users to access the software at the same time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
3 months ago
I think the most cost effective license type would be Single-use.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77