Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CompTIA Exam N10-009 Topic 5 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's N10-009 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 5
[All N10-009 Questions]

A network engineer configures a new switch and connects it to an existing switch for expansion and redundancy. Users immediately lose connectivity to the network. The network engineer notes the following spanning tree information from both switches:

Switch 1

Port State Cost

1 Forward 2

2 Forward 2

Switch 2

Port State Cost

1 Forward 2

2 Forward 2

Which of the following best describes the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Josephine
2 months ago
Clearly, the issue is that the port costs are equal. They need to be different to ensure proper load balancing and redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
2 months ago
Haha, the engineers must have been having a tech-comedy show when they set this up. RSTP, really? That's like using a rubber hammer to fix a leaky faucet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
2 months ago
C'mon, link aggregation is the way to go! Spread that traffic across multiple ports for maximum efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
2 months ago
Aha! The root bridge needs to be identified. That must be the issue here. The switches are fighting over who's the boss.
upvoted 0 times
Ronald
6 days ago
That makes sense. Let's check the spanning tree configuration to ensure proper election.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
8 days ago
No, it's better to let the switches elect the root bridge automatically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
1 months ago
Should we manually configure the root bridge?
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
1 months ago
Yes, you're right. The switches need to determine who the root bridge is.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wade
2 months ago
Wait, shouldn't the port costs be different? I thought redundancy meant having different paths with varying costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
2 months ago
Ah, I see the problem. The switch should be configured for RSTP to handle this situation and avoid the network outage. D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
2 months ago
Haha, this is like a game of musical chairs for network devices! The engineers need to figure out who's the 'root' switch before the users get disconnected.
upvoted 0 times
Luis
1 months ago
C: Maybe configuring the switch for RSTP will help resolve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
1 months ago
B: Yeah, they need to figure out which switch will be the root to avoid network disruptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
2 months ago
A: The issue is that a root bridge needs to be identified.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arthur
2 months ago
I believe the switch should be configured for RSTP to resolve the connectivity issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dante
2 months ago
I think the issue is that the port costs are equal, which can cause a network loop. The ports should have different costs to avoid this problem.
upvoted 0 times
Francene
1 months ago
User 4: It's important to identify a root bridge in the network as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hester
1 months ago
User 3: Maybe the switch should be configured for RSTP to prevent this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
1 months ago
Agreed, having equal port costs can cause a network loop.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
2 months ago
The port costs should not be equal.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ellen
2 months ago
I agree with Goldie, the port cost should be different for proper spanning tree operation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
2 months ago
Hmm, the ports have the same cost, so a root bridge needs to be identified to avoid a network loop. C seems like the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Domitila
2 months ago
Let's configure the switch for RSTP to prevent this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
2 months ago
Yeah, that could be causing a network loop. C is the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
2 months ago
The ports have the same cost, we need to identify a root bridge.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Goldie
3 months ago
I think the issue is that the port cost should not be equal.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77