Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CrowdStrike Exam CCFA-200 Topic 3 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for CrowdStrike's CCFA-200 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 3
[All CCFA-200 Questions]

When a host belongs to more than one host group, how is sensor update precedence determined?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The option that describes how sensor update precedence is determined when a host belongs to more than one host group is that all of the host's groups are examined in aggregate and the policy with highest precedence is applied to the host. A Sensor Update policy is a policy that controls how and when the Falcon sensor is updated on a host. You can create and assign custom Sensor Update policies to different hosts or groups in your environment. Each Sensor Update policy has a precedence value, which determines its priority over other policies. The higher the precedence value, the higher the priority. If a host belongs to more than one host group, each with a different Sensor Update policy assigned, then all of the host's groups are examined in aggregate and the policy with highest precedence among them is applied to the host.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Whitley
1 months ago
A) Groups have no impact on sensor update policies. Wow, that's super helpful. I'm sure the developers just threw that in there to really confuse us.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
2 months ago
I just hope the answer isn't 'E) Roll a D20 to determine sensor update precedence.' That would be a real gamble!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
2 months ago
B) Sensors of hosts that belong to more than one group must be manually updated. Oh, great, more work for the admins. I'm going with C or D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bethanie
2 months ago
A) Groups have no impact on sensor update policies. Really? That can't be right, groups are kind of the whole point here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haley
2 months ago
D) All of the host's groups are examined in aggregate and the policy with highest precedence is applied to the host. That makes sense, I don't want to have to manually update sensors for each group.
upvoted 0 times
Toi
16 days ago
Having the policy with the highest precedence applied to the host definitely simplifies the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberto
19 days ago
Groups have a big impact on sensor update policies, so it's important to understand how precedence is determined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arletta
23 days ago
I agree, it's much more efficient to have the policy with the highest precedence applied to the host.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
1 months ago
That's right, it would be too much work to manually update sensors for each group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
1 months ago
D) All of the host's groups are examined in aggregate and the policy with highest precedence is applied to the host
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
1 months ago
C) The highest precedence policy from the most important group is applied to the host
upvoted 0 times
...
Beata
1 months ago
A) Groups have no impact on sensor update policies
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raylene
2 months ago
C) The highest precedence policy from the most important group is applied to the host. Seems like the most logical approach to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alana
2 months ago
I'm feeling confident about option C. Gotta go with the big dog group, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
2 months ago
Haha, this reminds me of that time I accidentally joined the chess club and the debate team. Talk about sensor update headaches!
upvoted 0 times
...
Derrick
2 months ago
Oh man, this question is tricky. I'm going to have to go with option D. Gotta consider all the groups, not just the most important one.
upvoted 0 times
Rodrigo
1 months ago
Definitely, can't just focus on one group when a host belongs to multiple groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
1 months ago
Yeah, it's important to consider all the host groups to determine the sensor update precedence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
1 months ago
I think option D makes sense, gotta check all the groups for the highest precedence policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Latricia
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's D) All of the host's groups are examined in aggregate and the policy with highest precedence is applied to the host.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
2 months ago
That makes sense too, it's important to consider all the host's groups when determining sensor update precedence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
2 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer. The highest precedence policy from the most important group should be applied to the host.
upvoted 0 times
Candra
1 months ago
I think in that case, all the groups are considered together and the policy with the highest precedence is applied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
1 months ago
But what if the host belongs to multiple groups, wouldn't it be confusing to determine the most important one?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
1 months ago
I agree, option C makes sense. The most important group should have the highest precedence.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devorah
3 months ago
I think the answer is C) The highest precedence policy from the most important group is applied to the host.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77