Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CrowdStrike Exam CCFR-201 Topic 3 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for CrowdStrike's CCFR-201 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 3
[All CCFR-201 Questions]

When examining a raw DNS request event, you see a field called ContextProcessld_decimal. What is the purpose of that field?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Edelmira
2 months ago
Definitely not B. If it's not useful, why is it there in the first place? Sounds like someone was just lazy in their field naming conventions. *rolls eyes*
upvoted 0 times
Margurite
24 days ago
I agree, it does seem strange to have a field that's not useful. Maybe there's a reason we're not seeing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
1 months ago
C) It contains the ContextProcessld_decimal value for the parent process that made the DNS request
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
2 months ago
A) It contains the TargetProcessld_decimal value for other related events
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Richelle
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between A and C. I feel like it could go either way, but C seems a bit more logical. Although, who knows what kind of bizarre logic these security tools use. *shrugs*
upvoted 0 times
Bok
1 months ago
Yeah, these security tools can be a bit confusing sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
1 months ago
I agree, C seems like the most logical choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kara
2 months ago
I think it's C, it makes sense to have the parent process value.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viola
2 months ago
B has to be the right answer. An 'internal value not useful for an investigation' sounds like the kind of cryptic field that security tools love to include. #JustSecurityThings
upvoted 0 times
...
Anna
2 months ago
I'm going with D. The TargetProcessld_decimal value for the process that made the DNS request seems like the most relevant information to have in this field.
upvoted 0 times
Wayne
26 days ago
I'm sticking with D, the TargetProcessld_decimal value for the process that made the DNS request seems crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
28 days ago
I'm not sure, but A also sounds plausible. It could contain the TargetProcessld_decimal value for other related events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
1 months ago
I agree with you, C makes more sense in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
2 months ago
I think it's C. The ContextProcessld_decimal value for the parent process that made the DNS request would be more useful.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Broderick
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be related to the TargetProcessId_decimal value for other related events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
3 months ago
I agree with Laurel. It makes sense that it would link back to the parent process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
3 months ago
I think the purpose of the ContextProcessId_decimal field is to contain the ContextProcessId_decimal value for the parent process that made the DNS request.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
3 months ago
I think it's C. The ContextProcessld_decimal field should contain the parent process that made the DNS request, not the target process. That makes the most sense in the context of a DNS event.
upvoted 0 times
Felice
1 months ago
Exactly. It's a key piece of information for investigating DNS events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
1 months ago
So, the ContextProcessld_decimal value helps us trace back to the parent process for more context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
2 months ago
Yes, I agree. It's important to understand the relationship between processes in a DNS request event.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettye
2 months ago
I think it's C. The ContextProcessld_decimal field should contain the parent process that made the DNS request, not the target process. That makes the most sense in the context of a DNS event.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77