Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CWNP Exam CWDP-303 Topic 5 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWDP-303 exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 5
[All CWDP-303 Questions]

While performing a validation site survey, you realize that overlapping channels are being used on the 2.4 GHz bad due to the automatic channel assignment algorithm of the WLAN infrastructure. What should you do to prevent this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Elenore
4 months ago
Ooh, I bet Option B would be great! Buy new APs and pretend the old ones never existed. That's the IT way, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
4 months ago
D? Really? Using all 11 channels for 'optimal performance'? Sounds like someone's been huffing the WiFi dust. A is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Sharita
3 months ago
A) Reconfigure the automatic channel assignment settings to use only channels 1, 6, and 11
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
3 months ago
C) Reconfigure the network to use static channel plans because automatic channel assignment algorithms are all broken
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanford
4 months ago
A) Reconfigure the automatic channel assignment settings to use only channels 1, 6, and 11
upvoted 0 times
...
...
William
5 months ago
Option C is just asking for trouble. Static channel plans? In this day and age? Maybe we should all just start using tin cans and string instead.
upvoted 0 times
Jordan
3 months ago
Option C is just asking for trouble. Static channel plans? In this day and age? Maybe we should all just start using tin cans and string instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
4 months ago
B) Purchase and deploy new APs from a different vendor
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
4 months ago
A) Reconfigure the automatic channel assignment settings to use only channels 1, 6, and 11
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawanna
4 months ago
Option C is just asking for trouble. Static channel plans? In this day and age? Maybe we should all just start using tin cans and string instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
4 months ago
B) Purchase and deploy new APs from a different vendor
upvoted 0 times
...
Augustine
4 months ago
B) Purchase and deploy new APs from a different vendor
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
4 months ago
A) Reconfigure the automatic channel assignment settings to use only channels 1, 6, and 11
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
4 months ago
A) Reconfigure the automatic channel assignment settings to use only channels 1, 6, and 11
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anisha
5 months ago
I don't think leaving it as it is a good idea. We should follow best practices and reconfigure the automatic channel assignment settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
5 months ago
But what if we just leave it as it is? Maybe using all 11 channels in 2.4 GHz gives the best performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldo
5 months ago
I agree with Fletcher. Using only those channels will help prevent overlapping channels on the 2.4 GHz band.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
5 months ago
I think we should reconfigure the automatic channel assignment settings to use only channels 1, 6, and 11.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wendell
5 months ago
Option A seems like the logical choice here. Automatic channel assignment can cause issues, so we should limit the channels to the non-overlapping ones.
upvoted 0 times
Darrin
4 months ago
Beatriz: Definitely, using non-overlapping channels is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
4 months ago
It's important to avoid interference for better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
4 months ago
Agreed, that would help prevent overlapping channels on the 2.4 GHz band.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
5 months ago
I think we should reconfigure the automatic channel assignment settings to use only channels 1, 6, and 11.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77