Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CWNP Exam CWDP-303 Topic 6 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWDP-303 exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 6
[All CWDP-303 Questions]

During a validation site survey, you realize that the installers mounted some of the APs above the ceiling. They said that this was a request from the building architect due to aesthetics constraints. During the requirements gathering, you weren't advised about any aesthetics constraints from the main stakeholder of the project. What should you do in this case?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Shonda
5 months ago
I don't think increasing the output power or removing antennas will solve the issue. We need to address the root cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
5 months ago
Should we consider adjusting the output power on the APs or removing external antennas?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
5 months ago
Agreed. We need to start a new design process to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
5 months ago
I think we should advise the stakeholder that WLAN performance requirements won't be met.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
5 months ago
Yeah, that's definitely an issue. WLAN performance could be affected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
6 months ago
I can't believe they mounted some APs above the ceiling without informing us about aesthetic constraints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
6 months ago
Increasing output power or removing external antennas won't solve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
6 months ago
Agreed, we need a new design process to fix this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vonda
6 months ago
I think we should advise the stakeholder that WLAN performance requirements won't be met.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
7 months ago
What should we do about this issue?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
7 months ago
Yeah, that's not good for WLAN performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vonda
7 months ago
I can't believe the installers mounted some APs above the ceiling!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
8 months ago
I bet the architect thought mounting the APs above the ceiling would be 'out of sight, out of mind'. Little did they know, it's going to be a nightmare to troubleshoot and maintain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
8 months ago
Looks like the architect needs a lesson in wireless networking 101. This is a classic case of form over function, and it's not going to end well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katheryn
8 months ago
Using internal antennas to reduce multipath? That's like trying to put out a fire with gasoline. Definitely not the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
8 months ago
Increasing the output power by 6 dB? That's just going to create more interference and problems. Not a good solution at all.
upvoted 0 times
Tawna
7 months ago
We should advise the stakeholder about the WLAN performance requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emiko
7 months ago
I agree, increasing the output power is not the right solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lynelle
8 months ago
Wow, the installers really messed this one up. Allowing automatic channel management to fix it? No way, that's just a band-aid. We need to address this properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
8 months ago
This question is tricky! Mounting APs above the ceiling is a big no-no in my opinion. It's going to severely impact WLAN performance and coverage. I'd definitely advise the stakeholder that the requirements won't be met with this design.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77