Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CWNP Exam CWISA-102 Topic 4 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWISA-102 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 4
[All CWISA-102 Questions]

What user authentication method is commonly used in guest Wi-Fi networks in the hospitality industry?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Captive Portals for Guest Access:These are web pages that intercept users' requests before granting full internet access. They often require agreeing to terms, entering basic information, or viewing ads.

Hospitality Fit:Captive portals are simple to deploy, require minimal user setup, and provide control for the hospitality provider (e.g., usage limits).

Why Other Options Are Less Common:

NTLM:Microsoft authentication, mainly for corporate networks, too complex for casual guest use.

Kerberos:Complex authentication for enterprise, overkill for guest Wi-Fi

SIM Cards:Used in cellular devices, not for general Wi-Fi access.

References:

Captive Portals:References of how they work and their use cases.

Guest Wi-Fi in Hospitality:Best practices highlight the prevalence of captive portals in this industry.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Dottie
5 months ago
Captive portal, hands down. It's like the hotel version of 'welcome to the jungle, we've got cookies.'
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
5 months ago
NTLM? What is this, the Dark Ages? Captive portal is the way to go, my dudes.
upvoted 0 times
Maryrose
4 months ago
Yeah, NTLM is outdated. Captive portal is much more user-friendly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
4 months ago
Captive portal is definitely the way to go for guest Wi-Fi networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cletus
5 months ago
Kerberos? Isn't that like, a three-headed dog or something? I'm going with the portal.
upvoted 0 times
Fidelia
4 months ago
Definitely not NTLM or SIM cards for guest Wi-Fi networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
4 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Captive portal is commonly used in the hospitality industry.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
4 months ago
I'm pretty sure the authentication method used in guest Wi-Fi networks is a Captive portal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
4 months ago
I think Kerberos is a three-headed dog from Greek mythology.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Darrin
5 months ago
I believe Captive portal is the most commonly used method for guest Wi-Fi networks in the hospitality industry because it allows users to authenticate through a web page before accessing the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
5 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think NTLM could also be a possible option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
5 months ago
I agree with Lemuel, Captive portal makes sense for guest Wi-Fi networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
5 months ago
I think the answer is B) Captive portal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
6 months ago
Gotta be SIM cards, right? I mean, how else are they gonna track us, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Laurel
5 months ago
Yeah, Captive portal makes more sense for guest Wi-Fi networks in hotels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantell
5 months ago
A) NTLM
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
5 months ago
I think it's actually Captive portal, they usually make you agree to terms and conditions before accessing the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
5 months ago
B) Captive portal
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Desire
6 months ago
Captive portal, definitely! That's what I've seen in all the hotels I've stayed at.
upvoted 0 times
Edward
5 months ago
I agree, it's a simple and effective method for user authentication in guest Wi-Fi networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
5 months ago
It's a convenient way for guests to access the network and for the hotel to control access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
6 months ago
Yes, captive portal is commonly used in the hospitality industry for guest Wi-Fi networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77