Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CWNP Exam CWSP-207 Topic 2 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWSP-207 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 2
[All CWSP-207 Questions]

You are implementing an 802.11ac WLAN and a WIPS at the same time. You must choose between integrated and overlay WIPS solutions. Which of the following statements is true regarding integrated WIPS solutions?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Buffy
2 months ago
Option B sounds like the IT version of a 'spy versus spy' situation. Gotta keep those pesky threats under surveillance, am I right? *winks*
upvoted 0 times
Milly
1 months ago
B) Option B sounds like the IT version of a 'spy versus spy' situation. Gotta keep those pesky threats under surveillance, am I right? *winks*
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
1 months ago
C) Many integrated WIPS solutions that detect Voice over Wi-Fi traffic will cease scanning altogether to accommodate the latency sensitive client traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
1 months ago
B) Integrated WIPS use special sensors installed alongside the APs to scan for threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
2 months ago
A) Integrated WIPS always perform better from a client throughput perspective because the same radio that performs the threat scanning also services the clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ben
2 months ago
I heard that integrated WIPS solutions can be more cost-effective in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
2 months ago
Option D, huh? Well, I guess the saying 'you get what you pay for' applies here. Ain't no such thing as a free lunch, folks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
2 months ago
Ah, the age-old battle between integrated and overlay WIPS. Why can't they just make it simple and give us an all-in-one solution that works flawlessly? *sigh*
upvoted 0 times
Horace
2 months ago
C) Many integrated WIPS solutions that detect Voice over Wi-Fi traffic will cease scanning altogether to accommodate the latency sensitive client traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
2 months ago
B) Integrated WIPS use special sensors installed alongside the APs to scan for threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
2 months ago
A) Integrated WIPS always perform better from a client throughput perspective because the same radio that performs the threat scanning also services the clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rodolfo
3 months ago
I believe integrated WIPS solutions can impact client throughput.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tom
3 months ago
Option A sounds tempting, but I don't want to get carried away by the idea of 'better client throughput'. Gotta consider the bigger picture, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ling
3 months ago
I disagree, overlay WIPS solutions provide better threat scanning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
3 months ago
I think integrated WIPS solutions are more convenient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phuong
3 months ago
Hmm, I think option C is the correct answer here. No way am I going to let my VOIP traffic get interrupted by threat scanning, that's just bad news for my business calls.
upvoted 0 times
Candida
1 months ago
Lai: True, but I still think option C is the safest bet for maintaining quality VOIP calls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
1 months ago
I think option B is also a valid point, having special sensors dedicated to scanning for threats could be beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
1 months ago
But what about option A? Wouldn't having the same radio for threat scanning and client service be more efficient?
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
2 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice to ensure smooth VOIP traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
2 months ago
Yeah, I definitely don't want any interruptions in my business calls. Option C it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
2 months ago
I agree, option C makes the most sense. We can't afford to have our VOIP calls disrupted.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77