Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CyberArk Exam EPM-DEF Topic 3 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's EPM-DEF exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 3
[All EPM-DEF Questions]

An EPM Administrator needs to create a policy to allow the MacOS developers elevation to an application. What type of policy should be used?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Shala
2 months ago
Hey, why don't we just give them all admin rights and call it a day? It's the easiest solution, right? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
Matilda
6 days ago
D) Elevate MacOS Policy
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
7 days ago
That sounds like a more secure option. We should go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
10 days ago
C) Elevate Trusted Applications If Necessary Advanced Policy
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
22 days ago
No, giving admin rights to everyone is not a good idea. We need to follow proper security protocols.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlota
1 months ago
A) Elevate Application Group
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emogene
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe we should go with option B and create a dedicated group for the MacOS developers?
upvoted 0 times
Terina
23 days ago
Creating a dedicated group for the MacOS developers with option B seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
26 days ago
I think option B would work well for this situation. Let's go ahead and set that up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
1 months ago
That sounds like a good idea. We can create a Developer Applications Application Group for them.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micaela
2 months ago
Option D looks like the way to go. It's specifically designed for MacOS, so it should be the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
2 months ago
I think we need to go with option C. It seems like the most comprehensive policy to handle this situation.
upvoted 0 times
Ernest
29 days ago
Let's go with option C then, it covers all the bases for the MacOS developers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
1 months ago
I think option A could also work, but option C does seem more comprehensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
2 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amie
2 months ago
Hey, why don't we just give them all admin rights and call it a day? It's the easiest solution, right? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
Jacquline
1 months ago
C) Elevate Trusted Applications If Necessary Advanced Policy
upvoted 0 times
...
Jill
1 months ago
That sounds like a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
2 months ago
B) Developer Applications Application Group
upvoted 0 times
...
Loise
2 months ago
No, that would be a security risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
2 months ago
A) Elevate Application Group
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Precious
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) Developer Applications Application Group could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Elevate Trusted Applications If Necessary Advanced Policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe we should go with option B and create a dedicated group for the MacOS developers?
upvoted 0 times
Gwen
2 months ago
Let's go ahead and set up the policy using option B then. It seems like the most appropriate choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
2 months ago
I agree, having a dedicated group for them will make it easier to manage their access to the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darci
2 months ago
That sounds like a good idea. We can create a Developer Applications Application Group for the MacOS developers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dong
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) Elevate Application Group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
3 months ago
Option D looks like the way to go. It's specifically designed for MacOS, so it should be the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
Adelaide
1 months ago
Definitely. It's all about providing the right level of access while maintaining security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
2 months ago
That makes sense. It's important to have a policy that is tailored to the specific needs of the MacOS developers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
2 months ago
I agree, using the Elevate MacOS Policy would ensure that only MacOS developers have the necessary elevation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
2 months ago
Option D looks like the way to go. It's specifically designed for MacOS, so it should be the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Omega
3 months ago
I think we need to go with option C. It seems like the most comprehensive policy to handle this situation.
upvoted 0 times
Aide
2 months ago
Yes, option C covers all the necessary aspects for allowing MacOS developers elevation to an application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
2 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77