Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CyberArk Exam PAM-CDE-RECERT Topic 1 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's PAM-CDE-RECERT exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 1
[All PAM-CDE-RECERT Questions]

Your customer has five main data centers with one PVWA in each center under different URLs. How can you make this setup fault tolerant?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Tamekia
4 months ago
Looks like the correct answer is C. Though I'd probably implement it with a little more 'duct tape and chewing gum' to keep things interesting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
4 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a trick question. I bet the answer is 'All of the above' and the real solution is to sprinkle some fairy dust on the PVWAs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carli
4 months ago
A fault-tolerant setup with just one PVWA in each data center? Sounds like a recipe for disaster to me. I'll go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
Staci
4 months ago
Installing more PVWAs is a smart move to ensure high availability and fault tolerance in case of any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
4 months ago
I agree, having multiple PVWAs in each data center will help distribute the load and prevent a single point of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
4 months ago
Option B is a good choice. Having more PVWAs in each data center will definitely make the setup more fault tolerant.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mertie
4 months ago
This question is a piece of cake! Option B is clearly the correct answer. You can never have too many PVWAs, right?
upvoted 0 times
Laurel
4 months ago
True, having multiple options to ensure fault tolerance is key. It's important to consider all possibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
4 months ago
Installing more PVWAs might be a good idea, but I think load balancing them under the same URL could also help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
4 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to monitor the status of the PVWAs and redirect users if there are issues?
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
4 months ago
Option B is a good choice. Having more PVWAs can definitely help with fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Afton
5 months ago
I agree with Janet, having a monitoring system in place is crucial for fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janet
5 months ago
I think option C makes sense, it's important to have a backup plan in case of failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe we should continuously monitor PVWA status and redirect users to another PVWA if issues occur.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dolores
5 months ago
Option D seems like the best choice to me. Load balancing all the PVWAs under the same URL would make the setup more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
Amber
4 months ago
True, having a single URL for all PVWAs would simplify the setup and improve fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
4 months ago
I agree. It would also make it easier for users to access the PVWAs without having to remember multiple URLs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
4 months ago
That's a good point. It would definitely help distribute the load evenly.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
5 months ago
Option D seems like the best choice to me. Load balancing all the PVWAs under the same URL would make the setup more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Muriel
5 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. Monitoring the PVWA status and redirecting users is a smart way to handle fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
Sarina
4 months ago
I agree, monitoring and redirecting users to a different PVWA if needed is a proactive approach to maintaining fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
5 months ago
Option C is definitely the best choice. It ensures that users can always access a working PVWA.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kris
6 months ago
I think we should install more PVWAs in each data center to make it fault tolerant.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77