Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CyberArk Exam PAM-SEN Topic 1 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's PAM-SEN exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 1
[All PAM-SEN Questions]

A customer has five main data centers with one PVWA in each center under different URLs.

How can you make this setup fault tolerant?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Hester
2 months ago
Wow, this is a tough one. I'm going to have to go with D, but I can't help but wonder if there's some hidden catch here. Maybe the answer is to just blow up all the data centers and start over from scratch. That would be a real fault-tolerant solution, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
2 months ago
I think the real fault here is the person who came up with this question. It's like they're trying to trick us or something. Personally, I'm going with C, but I'm not too confident about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
2 months ago
I believe load balancing all PVWAs under the same URL would be the best option for fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
2 months ago
This question is a piece of cake! The setup is already fault-tolerant, so A is the way to go. Why overcomplicate things?
upvoted 0 times
Karon
1 months ago
C) Continuously monitor PVWA status and send users the link to another PVWA if issues are encountered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
1 months ago
B) Install more PVWAs in each data center.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
2 months ago
D) Load balance all PVWAs under same URL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alana
2 months ago
C) Continuously monitor PVWA status and send users the link to another PVWA if issues are encountered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghann
2 months ago
B) Install more PVWAs in each data center.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
2 months ago
A) This setup is already fault tolerant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
2 months ago
A) This setup is already fault tolerant.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominque
2 months ago
I think we should also continuously monitor PVWA status and redirect users to another PVWA if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
2 months ago
I agree with Valda, having more PVWAs would make the setup more fault tolerant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valda
3 months ago
I think we should install more PVWAs in each data center.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. What if we just install more PVWAs in each data center? That way, we have redundancy and can handle more users. I'm going with B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
3 months ago
I disagree, I think the correct answer is C. Continuously monitoring the PVWA status and sending users the link to another PVWA when issues are encountered is the way to go. That way, you can ensure that users always have access to a working PVWA.
upvoted 0 times
Rima
1 months ago
D) Load balance all PVWAs under same URL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
1 months ago
C) Continuously monitor PVWA status and send users the link to another PVWA if issues are encountered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
2 months ago
B) Install more PVWAs in each data center.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
2 months ago
A) This setup is already fault tolerant.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Franchesca
3 months ago
Well, I think the answer is obviously D. Load balancing all the PVWAs under the same URL is the way to go. That way, if one PVWA goes down, the users can seamlessly switch to another one without any disruption.
upvoted 0 times
Leonardo
2 months ago
A. This setup is already fault tolerant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
3 months ago
D. Load balance all PVWAs under same URL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
3 months ago
B: Agreed. Having all PVWAs under the same URL simplifies the process for users in case of any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
3 months ago
A: I think D is the best option too. It ensures high availability for the users.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77