Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CyberArk Exam PAM-SEN Topic 5 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's PAM-SEN exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 5
[All PAM-SEN Questions]

When creating a distributed Vault environment architecture, what is the maximum number of Vault servers that can be deployed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Glynda
2 months ago
Wait, there's a limit? I thought the more Vault servers, the better! Time to start a Vault server farm in my backyard.
upvoted 0 times
Leontine
1 months ago
D) 10 - 2 primary and 8 satellite
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
1 months ago
C) 6 - 1 primary and 5 satellite
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
1 months ago
B) 3 - all primary
upvoted 0 times
...
Slyvia
1 months ago
A) 5 - number of primary and satellite Vaults can be specified during installation
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pamella
2 months ago
I'm going with C. 6 - 1 primary and 5 satellite. Seems like a good balance of redundancy and simplicity.
upvoted 0 times
Sherron
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards option A. Having 5 servers gives a good balance for our architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
1 months ago
I think I'll go with option D. 10 servers seems like a solid number for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
1 months ago
I agree, having 1 primary and 5 satellite Vaults seems like a good setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Corinne
2 months ago
D is the answer, no doubt. 10 servers? That's overkill, but I'd rather have too much than not enough. Redundancy is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
2 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think A) 5 is more practical for most environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) 10 because having 2 primary and 8 satellite Vaults would provide better redundancy and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yong
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I'll have to think about this one. Maybe I should have paid more attention in the Vault architecture class.
upvoted 0 times
Kati
28 days ago
D) 10 - 2 primary and 8 satellite
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
29 days ago
C) 6 - 1 primary and 5 satellite
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanjuana
1 months ago
B) 3 - all primary
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
1 months ago
C) 6 - 1 primary and 5 satellite
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
1 months ago
B) 3 - all primary
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
2 months ago
A) 5 - number of primary and satellite Vaults can be specified during installation
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
2 months ago
A) 5 - number of primary and satellite Vaults can be specified during installation
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tiffiny
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) 5 because you can specify the number of primary and satellite Vaults during installation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
3 months ago
B is the way to go. 3 all primary servers should be enough for most use cases. Why overcomplicate things?
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is D. 10 - 2 primary and 8 satellite. It sounds like a good way to distribute the load and ensure high availability.
upvoted 0 times
Kristofer
2 months ago
Option B) 3 - all primary might be simpler to manage for some organizations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
2 months ago
Having 5 - number of primary and satellite Vaults specified during installation gives flexibility in scaling up or down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
2 months ago
I agree, having 2 primary and 8 satellite servers does sound like a good way to distribute the load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
2 months ago
I think option C) 6 - 1 primary and 5 satellite could also work well for a distributed Vault environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
2 months ago
I think I would go with option D as well, it seems like the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
2 months ago
I agree, having 2 primary and 8 satellite servers does seem like a good balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77