Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CyberArk Exam SECRET-SEN Topic 1 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's SECRET-SEN exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 1
[All SECRET-SEN Questions]

A customer wants to minimize the Kubernetes application code developers must change to adopt Conjur for secrets access.

Which solutions can meet this requirement? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Geoffrey
5 months ago
I'm not sure about Secrets Provider, but I think Secretless is a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
5 months ago
I agree with Thea, Secrets Provider and Secretless are the best options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
5 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writers were chuckling when they came up with this one. B) and D) for the win, folks. Keep it simple, keep it Secretless!
upvoted 0 times
Lai
4 months ago
Definitely, keeping it simple with Secretless is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
4 months ago
I agree, those are the best options for minimizing code changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
5 months ago
D) Secretless
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
5 months ago
B) Secrets Provider
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thea
5 months ago
I think Secrets Provider and Secretless can meet this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zana
5 months ago
Gotta love these Kubernetes secrets questions! Let's see, B) and D) sound like the way to go. Minimizing code changes is the key here, right?
upvoted 0 times
Holley
4 months ago
D) Secretless is another option that can help reduce the amount of code developers need to change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Almeta
5 months ago
B) Secrets Provider is a good choice for minimizing code changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77