I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't it be better to have at least three manager nodes to ensure true fault tolerance? I think the 'one manager, two worker' setup is a bit risky.

upvoted 0 times

Lisha

3 months ago

No, I don't think this configuration will achieve fault tolerance. We should consider adding more manager nodes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashlyn

3 months ago

Yes, I agree. It would be better to have at least three manager nodes for true fault tolerance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Heike

3 months ago

I think you're right. Having only one manager node for two worker nodes seems risky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vicki

3 months ago

I agree, more manager nodes would provide better fault tolerance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Veronika

3 months ago

Yes, having one manager for two workers might not be enough.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fannie

4 months ago

I think having three manager nodes would be safer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malinda

5 months ago

Yes, this configuration seems reasonable for achieving fault tolerance. Having one manager node for two worker nodes should provide some redundancy in case the manager node fails.

upvoted 0 times

Lorenza

4 months ago

No, this configuration may not be enough to ensure fault tolerance for managers in a swarm.

upvoted 0 times

...

Virgina

4 months ago

Yes, having one manager node for two worker nodes should help achieve fault tolerance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alyce

5 months ago

I'm not sure, but having multiple manager nodes might be better for fault tolerance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nan

5 months ago

Do you think one manager node for two worker nodes will achieve fault tolerance in a swarm?

upvoted 0 times

...