Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Eccouncil Exam 212-89 Topic 2 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 212-89 exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 2
[All 212-89 Questions]

Which of the following methods help incident responders to reduce the false-positive

alert rates and further provide benefits of focusing on topmost priority issues reducing

potential risk and corporate liabilities?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Lorean at Apr 11, 2024, 11:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 212-89 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Sarah
5 months ago
Threat attribution helps in understanding the origin of threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
6 months ago
I believe threat profiling is important to reduce potential risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christene
6 months ago
Yes, threat contextualization provides a broader view of the threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregg
6 months ago
Threat contextualization can also help in focusing on priority issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
6 months ago
I agree with Christene, threat correlation can prioritize topmost issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christene
6 months ago
I think threat correlation helps in reducing false-positive alert rates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
7 months ago
I see your point, but I still stand by C) Threat correlation because it helps to connect the dots and prioritize the most critical issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ayesha
7 months ago
I personally think A) Threat profiling is the best option to reduce false positives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
7 months ago
But wouldn't threat contextualization help in understanding the context of the threat and reduce false positives?
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
7 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's C) Threat correlation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
7 months ago
I think the answer is B) Threat contextualization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
8 months ago
Haha, nice one! But seriously, this is an important issue. Reducing those false positives is like finding a needle in a haystack, but with the right tools and techniques, it can make a huge difference in the effectiveness of the incident response team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
8 months ago
Haha, I'm just imagining the incident responders doing a little dance every time they manage to reduce a false-positive alert. 'Threat contextualization, threat correlation - who's your daddy now, false positives?'
upvoted 0 times
...
Felton
8 months ago
You're right, threat attribution is more about identifying the attackers, which is valuable information but doesn't necessarily help with this specific problem. I'd go with B, C, and D as the best choices here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about threat attribution. Isn't that more about identifying the actors behind the threats? While that information can be useful, I'm not sure it's as directly relevant to reducing false-positive alerts as the other options.
upvoted 0 times
Na
6 months ago
Threat profiling can help incident responders focus on the most critical issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
6 months ago
Threat contextualization also plays a crucial role in prioritizing issues effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
6 months ago
I think threat correlation is key to reducing false-positive alerts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vesta
8 months ago
I agree, those three methods seem to be the most effective in addressing the problem. Threat profiling helps us understand the patterns and characteristics of the threats we're dealing with, while contextualization and correlation allow us to put those threats into the bigger picture and identify the ones that pose the greatest risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
8 months ago
This is a great question! Reducing false-positive alerts is crucial for incident responders, as it allows them to focus on the truly important issues and minimize the risk and liabilities for the organization. I think a combination of threat profiling, contextualization, and correlation would be the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77