Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Eccouncil Exam 312-38 Topic 5 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-38 exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 5
[All 312-38 Questions]

Which category of suspicious traffic signatures includes SYN flood attempts?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lon
5 months ago
I still think Denial of Service is the best fit for SYN flood attempts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
6 months ago
I see where you're coming from, Yolande. SYN flood attempts could be used for Reconnaissance as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
6 months ago
But could it also be considered as Reconnaissance?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
6 months ago
I agree with Lon, Denial of Service makes sense for SYN flood attempts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lon
6 months ago
I think SYN flood attempts fall under Denial of Service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
6 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think it's more about causing denial of service
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
6 months ago
But some might argue it falls under Reconnaissance as it's an attempt to gather information about vulnerabilities
upvoted 0 times
...
Reynalda
6 months ago
I agree with Tanesha, as SYN flood attempts overwhelm a system and deny legitimate users access
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
7 months ago
I think SYN flood attempts fall under Denial of Service category
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77