Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Eccouncil Exam 312-39 Topic 7 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-39 exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 7
[All 312-39 Questions]

Which of the following steps of incident handling and response process focus on limiting the scope and extent of an incident?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kenneth
5 months ago
I believe it's A) Containment because it's important to control the incident from spreading further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
5 months ago
I feel like it could also be C) Eradication, to completely get rid of the incident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
5 months ago
I agree with Maryann, Containment is about limiting the scope of the incident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
6 months ago
I think the answer is A) Containment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
6 months ago
So A) Containment is the best option for limiting the scope and extent of an incident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
6 months ago
Eradication is actually about completely removing the incident, not just limiting it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
6 months ago
I'm not sure, but C) Eradication also sounds like it could limit the extent of the incident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
6 months ago
Yes, that makes sense. Containment is about limiting the scope of the incident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
7 months ago
I agree, but I think the answer is A) Containment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
7 months ago
I think the question about incident handling is tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
8 months ago
Haha, a 'controlled burn'? I think you've been watching too many action movies, my friend. Let's just focus on the actual incident response process, shall we?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
8 months ago
Exactly! Containment is the first and most crucial step. We need to stop the bleeding before we can start the healing process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
8 months ago
Good point, but Eradication comes after Containment. We can't eradicate anything if we don't first contain the incident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
8 months ago
Containment it is then. Hey, do you think they'll ask us to perform a 'controlled burn' to contain the incident? That would be cool!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
8 months ago
I agree, Containment is the key. We need to isolate the affected systems and stop the bleeding, so to speak.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
8 months ago
Containment - that's the obvious choice here. We need to limit the damage and prevent the incident from spreading further.
upvoted 0 times
Remedios
7 months ago
Definitely, containment is crucial to stop further damage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
7 months ago
A) Containment
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77