Eccouncil Exam 312-49 Topic 1 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-49 exam

Question #: 62
Topic #: 1

Jacob, a cybercrime investigator, joined a forensics team to participate in a criminal case involving digital evidence. After the investigator collected all the evidence and presents it to the court, the judge dropped the case and the defense attorney pressed charges against Jacob and the rest of the forensics team for unlawful search and seizure. What forensics privacy issue was not addressed prior to collecting the evidence?

ACompliance with the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

BCompliance with the Third Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

CNone of these

DCompliance with the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Karan at Jul 15, 2024, 03:52 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 312-49 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Dorthy

4 months ago

Haha, the defense attorney must have been a real Sherlock Holmes to catch the forensics team on a Fourth Amendment violation. Maybe they should have hired a private eye to do the dirty work instead of trying to do it themselves.

upvoted 0 times

Audra

2 months ago

D) Compliance with the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

upvoted 0 times

...

Orville

2 months ago

C) None of these

upvoted 0 times

...

Ben

3 months ago

B) Compliance with the Third Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

upvoted 0 times

...

Carin

3 months ago

A) Compliance with the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

upvoted 0 times

...

Glenna

4 months ago

C? Are you kidding me? This is like basic law enforcement 101. The Fourth Amendment is the only option that makes sense here. The defense attorney must have been a real shark to get the case dropped on a technicality like that.

upvoted 0 times

Ryan

3 months ago

Yeah, the defense attorney really knew how to exploit that loophole.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rocco

4 months ago

I agree, the Fourth Amendment is crucial when it comes to digital evidence.

upvoted 0 times

...

Milly

4 months ago

Yeah, they should have ensured compliance with the Fourth Amendment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Winfred

4 months ago

I think they didn't address the Fourth Amendment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bong

5 months ago

I can't believe they got charged for unlawful search and seizure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tammy

5 months ago

D? Clearly the answer is D. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable search and seizure. Looks like the forensics team forgot to get a warrant before collecting the evidence. Rookie mistake.

upvoted 0 times

Naomi

3 months ago

It's a serious oversight on their part. The defense attorney had a strong case against them for unlawful search and seizure. They should have been more careful.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashanda

3 months ago

Yes, you're right. The Fourth Amendment is crucial when it comes to digital evidence. They should have definitely obtained a warrant before collecting anything.

upvoted 0 times

...

Loreta

3 months ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Gwenn

3 months ago

It's a crucial step in ensuring the evidence is admissible in court. They really dropped the ball on that one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dannette

4 months ago

Yeah, they definitely should have gotten a warrant before collecting the evidence. That's a big oversight.

upvoted 0 times

...

James

4 months ago

You're right, the Fourth Amendment is all about protecting against unreasonable search and seizure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Susana

5 months ago

Wait, the Fourth Amendment? Seriously? I thought this was a cybercrime case, not a history lesson. Next time, the forensics team should have a lawyer on speed dial, not a history book.

upvoted 0 times

Olen

4 months ago

I agree, it's important to understand the legal implications when dealing with digital evidence.

upvoted 0 times

...

Albert

4 months ago

Yeah, they should have definitely consulted a lawyer before collecting the evidence.

upvoted 0 times

...