Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Eccouncil Exam 312-50 Topic 3 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-50 exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 3
[All 312-50 Questions]

You are the lead cybersecurity analyst at a multinational corporation that uses a hybrid encryption system to secure inter-departmental communications. The system uses RSA encryption for key exchange and AES for data encryption, taking advantage of the strengths of both asymmetric and symmetric encryption. Each RSA

key pair has a size of 'n' bits, with larger keys providing more security at the cost of slower performance. The time complexity of generating an RSA key pair is O(n*2), and AES encryption has a time complexity of O(n). An attacker has developed a quantum algorithm with time complexity O((log n)*2) to crack RSA encryption. Given *n=4000' and variable 'AES key size', which scenario is likely to provide the best balance of security and

performance?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

A hybrid encryption system is a system that combines the advantages of both asymmetric and symmetric encryption algorithms. Asymmetric encryption, such as RSA, uses a pair of keys: a public key and a private key, which are mathematically related but not identical. Asymmetric encryption can provide key exchange, authentication, and non-repudiation, but it is slower and less efficient than symmetric encryption. Symmetric encryption, such as AES, uses a single key to encrypt and decrypt data. Symmetric encryption is faster and more efficient than asymmetric encryption, but it requires a secure way to share the key.

In a hybrid encryption system, RSA encryption is used for key exchange, and AES encryption is used for data encryption. This way, the system can benefit from the security of RSA and the speed of AES. However, the system also depends on the key sizes of both algorithms, which affect the security and performance of the system.

The key size of RSA encryption determines the number of bits in the public and private keys. The larger the key size, the more secure the encryption, but also the slower the key generation and encryption/decryption processes. The time complexity of generating an RSA key pair is O(n*2), where n is the key size in bits. This means that the time required to generate an RSA key pair increases quadratically with the key size. For example, if it takes 1 second to generate a 1024-bit RSA key pair, it will take 4 seconds to generate a 2048-bit RSA key pair, and 16 seconds to generate a 4096-bit RSA key pair.

The key size of AES encryption determines the number of bits in the symmetric key. The larger the key size, the more secure the encryption, but also the more rounds of encryption/decryption are needed. The time complexity of AES encryption is O(n), where n is the key size in bits. This means that the time required to encrypt/decrypt data increases linearly with the key size. For example, if it takes 1 second to encrypt/decrypt data with a 128-bit AES key, it will take 2 seconds to encrypt/decrypt data with a 256-bit AES key, and 4 seconds to encrypt/decrypt data with a 512-bit AES key.

An attacker has developed a quantum algorithm with time complexity O((log n)*2) to crack RSA encryption. This means that the time required to break RSA encryption decreases exponentially with the key size. For example, if it takes 1 second to break a 1024-bit RSA encryption, it will take 0.25 seconds to break a 2048-bit RSA encryption, and 0.0625 seconds to break a 4096-bit RSA encryption. This makes RSA encryption vulnerable to quantum attacks, unless the key size is very large.

Given n=4000 and variable AES key size, the scenario that is likely to provide the best balance of security and performance is C. AES key size=192 bits. This configuration is a compromise between options A and B, providing moderate security and performance. Option A, AES key size=128 bits, provides less security than option C, but RSA key generation and AES encryption will be faster. Option B, AES key size=256 bits, provides more security than option C, but RSA key generation may be slow. Option D, AES key size=512 bits, provides the highest level of security, but at a significant performance cost due to the large AES key size.


Hybrid cryptosystem - Wikipedia

RSA (cryptosystem) - Wikipedia

Advanced Encryption Standard - Wikipedia

Quantum computing and cryptography - Wikipedia

Contribute your Thoughts:

In
22 days ago
Ah, the age-old dilemma of security vs. performance. I say we go with option B and just tell the developers to 'git gud' when it comes to the slow RSA key generation. They could use the extra exercise, if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
Cristen
4 days ago
User 2: But won't the slow RSA key generation be a problem?
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
8 days ago
User 1: Option B seems like the best choice for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Truman
28 days ago
Option A with the 128-bit AES key? Really? That just seems like asking for trouble, even if it's faster. I'll stick with the more secure options, thank you very much.
upvoted 0 times
Fausto
5 days ago
User 2: I think option B with the 256-bit AES key is the way to go for better security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
8 days ago
User 1: I agree, option A does seem risky with the 128-bit AES key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aleisha
1 months ago
I don't know, I'm leaning towards option C. 192-bit AES seems like a good balance between security and performance. Plus, I'm not a fan of the huge performance hit from the 512-bit AES key size in option D.
upvoted 0 times
Crissy
5 days ago
Annett: True, but the slower RSA key generation could be a drawback in option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
8 days ago
User 3: I'm not sure, I feel like option B with 256-bit AES key size might be more secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
14 days ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. It provides moderate security without sacrificing too much performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
19 days ago
User 1: I think option C with 192-bit AES key size is a good balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marylin
2 months ago
Hmm, I think option B with the 256-bit AES key is the way to go. Sure, the RSA key generation might be a bit slow, but the extra security is worth it in today's cyber landscape.
upvoted 0 times
Gilberto
7 days ago
User 4: I think we should prioritize security with the 256-bit AES key, even if it means a slight delay in RSA key generation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherilyn
8 days ago
User 3: Option B seems like a good balance between security and performance, especially with the advanced cyber threats we face.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bonita
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, the extra security provided by the 256-bit AES key outweighs the potential slowdown in RSA key generation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, option B with the 256-bit AES key sounds like the best choice for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Matthew
2 months ago
I agree with Yuriko. Option B provides a high level of security while still maintaining reasonable performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
2 months ago
I think option B with AES key size=256 bits is the best balance of security and performance.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77