Eccouncil Exam 312-96 Topic 2 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-96 exam

Question #: 25
Topic #: 2

Which of the following method will you use in place of ex.printStackTrace() method to avoid printing stack trace on error?

Aex.StackTrace.getError();

Bex.message();

Cex.getMessage();

Dex.getError();

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Lynna at Sep 07, 2024, 08:36 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 312-96 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Denny

2 months ago

You know, I was gonna say ex.StackTrace.getError(), but then I realized that's not even a real thing. C) ex.getMessage() is where it's at.

upvoted 0 times

Vashti

1 months ago

Yeah, ex.StackTrace.getError() is a made-up method. C) ex.getMessage() is the correct one to use.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herminia

1 months ago

ex.getMessage() is definitely the way to go to avoid printing the stack trace.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dick

2 months ago

I agree, ex.StackTrace.getError() doesn't exist. C) ex.getMessage() is the correct method to use.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anastacia

2 months ago

Hah, ex.printStackTrace()? What is this, amateur hour? C) ex.getMessage() is the real deal, folks.

upvoted 0 times

Deangelo

2 months ago

ex.printStackTrace() is so outdated, C) ex.getMessage() is the modern choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Meaghan

2 months ago

I agree, ex.getMessage() is much cleaner.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arminda

2 months ago

C) ex.getMessage() is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Robt

2 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think D) ex.getError() might also work

upvoted 0 times

...

Werner

2 months ago

I agree with Mammie, using ex.getMessage() will avoid printing the stack trace

upvoted 0 times

...

Mammie

3 months ago

I think the answer is C) ex.getMessage()

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladys

3 months ago

I'm gonna have to go with C) ex.getMessage(). It's the most straightforward way to get the error message without all the extra fluff.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joanne

3 months ago

C) ex.getMessage(); is the way to go! No need to clutter the output with that pesky stack trace.

upvoted 0 times

Cassi

2 months ago

ex.getMessage() is the best option to avoid cluttering the output.

upvoted 0 times

...

Terina

2 months ago

I always use ex.getMessage() to avoid printing the stack trace.

upvoted 0 times

...

Freida

2 months ago

ex.getMessage() is definitely the way to go, keeps things simple.

upvoted 0 times

...

William

2 months ago

I agree, ex.getMessage() is much cleaner than ex.printStackTrace().

upvoted 0 times

...