Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Ericsson Exam ECP-206 Topic 4 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Ericsson's ECP-206 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 4
[All ECP-206 Questions]

Contribute your Thoughts:

Vi
4 months ago
C) Use a separate OSPF instance for each customer? Sounds like a lot of extra work to me. I'd go with B) for the win.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
4 months ago
Ha! D) Use a unique AS number for each customer? That's like trying to put a square peg in a round hole. Clearly not the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
Dominga
3 months ago
Using a separate OSPF instance for each customer might be a good way to avoid conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
3 months ago
Implementing L3VPN using the MP-BGP protocol could also work to separate the IP ranges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
3 months ago
I think connecting each customer to dedicated PEs would be a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
3 months ago
Agreed, using a unique AS number for each customer doesn't seem like the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kindra
4 months ago
I believe using a unique AS number for each customer would be the most efficient way to accomplish the task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harley
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe A) Implement L3VPN using the MP-BGP protocol? That sounds like a more robust and scalable solution.
upvoted 0 times
Pamella
3 months ago
Yeah, that does seem like a reliable solution for connecting the sites with the same IP ranges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
4 months ago
I think A) Implement L3VPN using the MP-BGP protocol is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sabina
4 months ago
I disagree, I think connecting each customer to dedicated PEs would be a more secure option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
4 months ago
Definitely B) Connect each customer to dedicated PEs. That's the only way to keep their IP ranges separate and avoid any potential conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
Ligia
3 months ago
Implementing L3VPN using the MP-BGP protocol could be another option, but connecting to dedicated PEs is a simpler solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilburn
3 months ago
Using a unique AS number for each customer could also work, but connecting to dedicated PEs seems more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
3 months ago
It's important to keep their IP ranges separate to avoid any conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
3 months ago
I agree, connecting each customer to dedicated PEs is the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Clarence
4 months ago
I agree with Meghann, using L3VPN with MP-BGP would be the best solution to connect the sites for both customers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghann
4 months ago
I think the service provider should implement L3VPN using the MP-BGP protocol.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77