Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Ericsson Exam ECP-206 Topic 7 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Ericsson's ECP-206 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 7
[All ECP-206 Questions]

In OSPFv2, which route characteristic is used to determine the best path?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

In OSPFv2, the route characteristic that is used to determine the best path is the cost. The cost is a metric that represents the link bandwidth, delay, reliability, or other factors. The cost is inversely proportional to the bandwidth, meaning that a higher bandwidth link has a lower cost. The cost of a route is calculated by adding the costs of all links along the path. OSPFv2 uses the following formula to calculate the cost of an interface:

Cost = Reference bandwidth / Interface bandwidth in bps

The reference bandwidth is a constant value that can be configured by the network administrator. By default, it is 100 Mbps. The interface bandwidth is the actual bandwidth of the interface in bits per second.For example, if an interface has a bandwidth of 10 Mbps, its cost would be 100 Mbps / 10 Mbps = 101415.

OSPFv2 does not use jitter, packet loss, or delay as route characteristics to determine the best path. Jitter is the variation in latency or delay between packets. Packet loss is the percentage of packets that are dropped or corrupted during transmission. Delay is the time it takes for a packet to travel from source to destination.These characteristics are not part of the OSPFv2 protocol and are not advertised in OSPFv2 LSAs1617.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Royce
2 months ago
Ah, the age-old question: should I go with the cost, or the cost? I'm thinking cost. C is the way to go, my friends.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
2 months ago
Jitter? Sounds like something you'd use to measure the performance of your espresso machine, not a routing protocol. C is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Dorsey
19 days ago
I always thought delay was the most important factor, but I see now that cost is the way to go in OSPFv2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rochell
22 days ago
Yeah, jitter does sound more like a coffee term. Cost is definitely the key factor in OSPFv2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
24 days ago
I agree, C is the correct answer. Cost is used to determine the best path in OSPFv2.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Walker
2 months ago
Packet loss? What is this, the 90s? We're living in the era of reliable networks now. Gotta be C, the cost-based routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
2 months ago
Delay? Really? Who cares about how long it takes the packets to get there, as long as they arrive eventually, right? I'm going with C, the cost option.
upvoted 0 times
Frankie
1 months ago
Yeah, cost is definitely a key characteristic to consider in OSPFv2 routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
1 months ago
I agree, I think cost is a more important factor to consider when choosing the best path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
1 months ago
Delay is actually an important factor in determining the best path in OSPFv2.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mila
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) delay could also be a factor in determining the best path.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
3 months ago
Cost, obviously. OSPF is all about finding the cheapest path, not the fastest or most reliable one. C is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Jenise
1 months ago
Exactly, that's why C is the correct answer for determining the best path in OSPF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
2 months ago
So, the lower the cost, the better the path in OSPF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
2 months ago
Yeah, OSPF calculates the cost based on bandwidth. It's all about efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
3 months ago
I agree, cost is the key factor in OSPF routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janet
3 months ago
I agree with Theron, cost is used to determine the best path in OSPFv2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
3 months ago
I think the answer is C) cost.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77