Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Esri Exam EADP19-001 Topic 2 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EADP19-001 exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 2
[All EADP19-001 Questions]

The ArcGlS user is given data for the Arctic and is asked to perform various types of analysis using the dat

a. The data extend from the North pole south to 70 degrees North Latitude Data layers may contain points, lines, or polygons, and Include ice surveys from NOAA depth contours continental margins, locations of Known and suspected oil reserves, endangered species habitat and territorial boundaries for nations having Arctic coastline.

Given known petroleum reserves in the Arctic, plus areas reserved for endangered species habitat the user must determine the area In square miles that is available for oil extraction development for the United States.

Which protection is best suited for this analysis?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Silvana
18 days ago
Hmm, let me think... Albers equal area conic sounds like the way to go here. Gotta keep those oil rigs and endangered critters from colliding, you know? Though I'm pretty sure the oil companies would try to drill through a polar bear's den if they thought they could get away with it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
21 days ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I was gonna go with the double stereographic, but now I'm second-guessing myself. Decisions, decisions... At least I know the Arctic is a pretty cool place, even if the politics around it are a bit icy.
upvoted 0 times
Gilberto
21 hours ago
User 1: I think the best protection for this analysis is Albers equal area conic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gracia
30 days ago
I see your point, Yolande. Albers equal area conic does seem like a good choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe Albers equal area conic would be more suitable for this type of analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
1 months ago
I think the best protection for this analysis is Lambert azimuthal equal area.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
1 months ago
C'mon, this is easy. Albers equal area conic all the way. Gotta love that area preservation for this kind of regional analysis. Though I bet the oil companies are gonna try to squeeze every last drop out of those reserves, endangered species be darned.
upvoted 0 times
Suzi
8 days ago
Oil companies will definitely try to maximize extraction, but we need to consider the long-term impact on the environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
14 days ago
Yeah, it's important to prioritize area preservation, especially for endangered species habitat.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
23 days ago
I agree, Albers equal area conic is the best choice for this analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
German
1 months ago
Hmm, the Arctic data seems pretty complex. I think the Albers equal area conic projection would be best for this analysis, since it preserves area and is well-suited for large regions like the Arctic. Though I'm curious if the oil reserves and endangered species habitats are going to overlap - that could get tricky.
upvoted 0 times
Emmett
25 days ago
Yes, it's important to preserve area when dealing with such complex data sets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
27 days ago
I agree, the Albers equal area conic projection would be the best choice for this analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77