Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Esri Exam EADP19-001 Topic 5 Question 59 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EADP19-001 exam
Question #: 59
Topic #: 5
[All EADP19-001 Questions]

An ArcGIS user is tasked with editing a layer containing a large number of features, using another layer that is in a different coordinate a system as reference. The user adds the layers in ArcMap and starts an edit session. A warning message about editing data in a different coordinate system is displayed.

What is the most efficient way to edit the data to avoid potential distortion in the data?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Arlette
21 days ago
Georeferencing, huh? Sounds like a job for the intern. I'm going with B, much less drama that way.
upvoted 0 times
Myong
7 days ago
B: I agree, it's the most efficient way to avoid distortion in the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
8 days ago
A: I think changing the data frame's coordinate system is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barabara
24 days ago
Seriously, Talia? Topology for this? What is this, the 90s? Option B all the way, let's keep it simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
29 days ago
Wait, what do you mean it's not option D? Topology is the way to go, no doubt about it. Snap that data right into place!
upvoted 0 times
Darrel
17 days ago
A) change the data frame's coordinate system to match the coordinate system of the layer being edited
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brandee
1 months ago
Ah, the good ol' coordinate system shuffle. I'm going to have to go with B here. Can't risk distorting the data, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Eric
3 days ago
Definitely, B is the safest option to prevent any distortion in the data. Good choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
6 days ago
Yes, B is the way to go. It's important to make sure the coordinate systems match to avoid any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
11 days ago
B) project the reference layer so the coordinate system matches with the one that needs to be edited
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
15 days ago
A) change the data frame's coordinate system to match the coordinate system of the layer being edited
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jacquelyne
1 months ago
Hmm, I was thinking option C, but then I remembered that georeferencing can be a real pain. I'll stick with option B, it seems like the most efficient way to handle this.
upvoted 0 times
Dorian
9 days ago
D) create a geodatabase topology with the two layers and add a rule so new data always snaps to the reference layer
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
14 days ago
C) georeference the reference layer and start a new edit session
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
16 days ago
B) project the reference layer so the coordinate system matches with the one that needs to be edited
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
26 days ago
A) change the data frame's coordinate system to match the coordinate system of the layer being edited
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Louann
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe projecting the reference layer to match the coordinate system of the layer being edited is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
1 months ago
Oh man, this is a tricky one! I'm going to go with option B - projecting the reference layer. That way, I don't have to change the data frame and risk messing up my other layers.
upvoted 0 times
Shay
20 days ago
User4: Projecting the reference layer seems like the safest option to avoid data distortion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
1 months ago
User3: I agree, changing the data frame's coordinate system could cause more issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
1 months ago
User2: That sounds like a good idea, it's important to keep the coordinate systems consistent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
1 months ago
User1: I think option B is the way to go, projecting the reference layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cassie
2 months ago
I think the best option is to change the data frame's coordinate system to match the layer being edited.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77