Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Esri Exam EADP19-001 Topic 6 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EADP19-001 exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 6
[All EADP19-001 Questions]

An ArcGIS user is tasked with creating a map of the state of Utah displaying all the rivers for a conservation group. The conservation group is only interested in seeing rivers longer than 15 miles, where the longer rivers appear thicker using graduated symbols.

What are two ways the ArcGIS user can eliminate rivers less than 5 miles in length from appearing in the map? (Choose two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Carole
4 months ago
You know, I bet those conservation folks would appreciate a little humor on the map. Maybe we can add some 'Dry Creek' labels for the sub-5 mile rivers, just for a laugh.
upvoted 0 times
Chandra
4 months ago
Nicolette: I like that idea! It would definitely bring some humor to the conservation group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
4 months ago
How about adding 'Dry Creek' labels for the shorter rivers? It could add a fun touch to the map.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
4 months ago
That's a good idea. We can also build a layer expression to further refine the map.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
4 months ago
We could use a definition query to filter out rivers less than 5 miles.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cornell
5 months ago
Ha! Forget those tiny rivers, we want the BIG ones. B and C, all the way, my friends.
upvoted 0 times
Audry
3 months ago
Exactly! Filtering out the shorter rivers will make the map more focused on the important ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marg
3 months ago
C) Build a definition query
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
4 months ago
B) Built a data exclusion expression
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
4 months ago
Yes, that's right! We only want to see the long rivers on the map.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
4 months ago
C) Build a definition query
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernice
4 months ago
B) Built a data exclusion expression
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomoko
4 months ago
Perfect! With both C) and B) in place, we'll have a map filled with the long, important rivers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thea
4 months ago
Agreed! B) Built a data exclusion expression will also help remove the unwanted rivers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
4 months ago
Yes, definitely C) Build a definition query to filter out the short rivers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimbery
5 months ago
This is a no-brainer! C and D all the way. Definition query to filter out the small fry, and layer expression to make those big boys pop on the map.
upvoted 0 times
Jaime
4 months ago
D) Build a layer expression
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlena
4 months ago
C) Build a definition query
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Youlanda
5 months ago
Yes, combining a definition query with a layer expression would ensure that only rivers longer than 15 miles are shown on the map.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
5 months ago
Another way could be to build a layer expression to only display rivers longer than 15 miles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
5 months ago
I'm thinking B and D would be the best options. Layer expression can help with the graduated symbols, and data exclusion takes care of the short rivers.
upvoted 0 times
Aja
4 months ago
It's important to have a clear and accurate representation of the rivers for the conservation group to make informed decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherilyn
4 months ago
Definitely, those two options will ensure that only rivers longer than 15 miles are displayed on the map.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andrew
4 months ago
I agree, using a layer expression for symbolizing longer rivers and a data exclusion expression to filter out shorter ones makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
5 months ago
B and D are good choices. Layer expression will help with the graduated symbols, and data exclusion will remove the short rivers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cristal
5 months ago
I agree with Cassie, a definition query would be a good way to filter out shorter rivers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
5 months ago
Definitely go with B and C. Data exclusion and definition query are the way to go to filter out those puny little rivers.
upvoted 0 times
Ivette
4 months ago
C) Build a definition query
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
4 months ago
B) Built a data exclusion expression
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvis
5 months ago
That's a good point, we want to make sure the map is clear and only shows the important rivers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
5 months ago
I agree, using a data exclusion expression and a definition query will help us focus on the longer rivers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cassie
6 months ago
I think the ArcGIS user can use a definition query to eliminate rivers less than 5 miles.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77