Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Esri Exam EADP19-001 Topic 6 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EADP19-001 exam

Question #: 53
Topic #: 6

[All EADP19-001 Questions]

An ArcGlS user has high-resolution single-band data and another raster data set that is multiband with lower resolution. Which process is used to convert the single-band data to multi-band, while retaining its resolution?

Astack bands

BNDVI

Cpan sharpen

Dvisualize

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Gearldine at Sep 13, 2024, 08:41 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium EADP19-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lizette

2 months ago

Pan sharpen all the way! C) is the clear winner here. Although, I have to say, I'm a bit disappointed they didn't include an option for 'throw it all in the microwave and see what happens.' That's usually my go-to strategy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rhea

2 months ago

I'm going with C) pan sharpen. Seems like the obvious choice to me. Although, I do wonder if there's some secret trick involving stacking bands that I'm missing...

upvoted 0 times

Luann

2 months ago

I'm not sure, maybe stacking bands could work too.

upvoted 0 times

...

German

2 months ago

I agree, pan sharpen seems like the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nan

2 months ago

I think C) pan sharpen is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Micheline

2 months ago

I think pan sharpen is used to enhance spatial resolution, not convert single-band to multi-band data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shoshana

2 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think C) pan sharpen could also be a valid option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jean

2 months ago

D) visualize? Really? Who would even consider that as an option here? The question is specifically about converting data, not just viewing it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shay

2 months ago

I agree with Myrtie, stacking bands is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krystal

2 months ago

Definitely C) pan sharpen. That's the classic way to combine high-res single-band data with lower-res multi-band data.

upvoted 0 times

Sabra

1 months ago

Visualizing is important too, but pan sharpening is the key process here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nohemi

1 months ago

Stacking bands wouldn't work in this case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephen

2 months ago

It's important to maintain the resolution when combining the data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chantay

2 months ago

I agree, pan sharpening is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Linwood

3 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. I was thinking B) NDVI might work, but I'm not confident about that. Pan sharpening does sound like the right approach though.

upvoted 0 times

Shawnta

2 months ago

Pan sharpening it is!

upvoted 0 times

...

Shannon

2 months ago

Let's go with pan sharpening then.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wade

2 months ago

I agree, pan sharpening would retain the resolution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharan

2 months ago

I think pan sharpening is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Myrtie

3 months ago

I think the answer is A) stack bands.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shelton

3 months ago

I think the answer is C) pan sharpen. That seems like the best way to maintain the high resolution while adding more bands.

upvoted 0 times

Lemuel

2 months ago

Yes, stacking bands would just combine them without improving resolution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernest

3 months ago

I agree, pan sharpening is the way to go to maintain high resolution.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77