Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Esri Exam EADP19-001 Topic 8 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EADP19-001 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 8
[All EADP19-001 Questions]

An ArcGIS user is tasked with editing a layer containing a large number of features, using another layer that is in a different coordinate a system as reference. The user adds the layers in ArcMap and starts an edit session. A warning message about editing data in a different coordinate system is displayed.

What is the most efficient way to edit the data to avoid potential distortion in the data?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Dick
6 months ago
That could work too, but it might involve more steps compared to just changing the data frame's coordinate system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
6 months ago
I would go with option B, projecting the reference layer to match the coordinate system of the layer being edited.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thad
6 months ago
That sounds like a logical approach. It would ensure that there's no distortion in the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenise
6 months ago
I think the best way is to change the data frame's coordinate system to match the layer being edited.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
7 months ago
Creating a geodatabase topology with a rule for snapping to the reference layer sounds like a good solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
7 months ago
I think georeferencing the layer and starting a new edit session is the way to go, it ensures accuracy in the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
7 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more efficient because it directly addresses the issue of different coordinate systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
7 months ago
I think option A is the best way to edit the data without distorting it.
upvoted 0 times
Irma
6 months ago
That sounds like a good solution to avoid distortion in the data
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
7 months ago
Option A) change the data frame's coordinate system to match the coordinate system of the layer being edited
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorita
8 months ago
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. And what if the projection isn't perfect? Then we could still end up with distortion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. Wouldn't that just be creating a whole new layer? Seems like a lot of extra work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
8 months ago
I'm thinking option B is the way to go. Projecting the reference layer to match the one being edited seems like the most efficient approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
8 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. The key is that we need to make sure the data doesn't get distorted, right? So we need to match the coordinate systems somehow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laila
8 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Coordinate systems always trip me up. But let's see what we can come up with here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
8 months ago
Ugh, another coordinate system question? I thought we were done with those after the last exam. This is going to be a tricky one for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77