Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Exin Exam SIAMP Topic 5 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Exin's SIAMP exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 5
[All SIAMP Questions]

ZYXS has been appointed as the service integrator ZYXH will provide the retained capabilities The CEO has asked the ZYXS IT Director to prepare a governance approach for monitoring and measuring service performance that will support the achievement of the strategic objective to ensure delivery against contracts.

What is the best approach?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Objective and Context:

ZYXH wants to ensure delivery against contracts and has appointed ZYXS as the service integrator.

The CEO requests a governance approach to monitor and measure service performance.

End-to-End Service Assurance:

ZYXS, as the service integrator, is responsible for ensuring the delivery of end-to-end services. This includes integrating services from various providers and maintaining overall service performance.

Monitoring by ZYXH:

ZYXH will focus on monitoring ZYXS's performance as the integrator, ensuring that the strategic objectives are met and benefits are realized.

ZYXH will evaluate the overall outcomes and effectiveness of the SIAM transition, including service quality and contract adherence.

Governance Approach:

This approach aligns with the SIAM principle of having the service integrator manage operational responsibilities while the retained organization oversees strategic performance and benefits realization.


SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on Service Performance Management

ITIL 4: Direct, Plan and Improve (DPI), Section on Governance and Reporting

SIAM Professional Body of Knowledge (BoK), Chapter on Governance and Service Assurance

ITIL 4: Direct, Plan and Improve (DPI), Section on Monitoring and Measuring Performance

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ettie
2 months ago
Haha, trust-building exercise, eh Jose? I'm picturing a trust fall between the CEOs. 'Don't worry, I gotcha!' *thud*. But in all seriousness, Option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
2 months ago
Hmm, Option C is the clear winner here. Though I'm curious, do ZYXH and ZYXS have any history of working together? Might be good to add a little 'trust-building' exercise, you know, just in case.
upvoted 0 times
Terrilyn
24 days ago
True, a trust-building exercise could help strengthen their partnership. It's always good to have a solid foundation when working together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
1 months ago
I agree, Option C seems to cover all the bases. As for the history between ZYXH and ZYXS, I'm not sure. Maybe a trust-building exercise wouldn't hurt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
2 months ago
Option C is definitely the best approach. It ensures ZYXS takes responsibility for end-to-end service delivery.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tran
2 months ago
Option C is the way to go. ZYXH should be focused on the big picture, not getting bogged down in individual service provider monitoring. That's ZYXS's job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
2 months ago
I agree with Vashti. Option C provides the right balance of responsibilities between ZYXS and ZYXH. It's important to have clear accountability and visibility across the service delivery chain.
upvoted 0 times
Queen
1 months ago
Agreed, it's important for ZYXS to assure delivery of the end-to-end service while ZYXH monitors performance and benefits realization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
1 months ago
I think Option C ensures clear accountability and visibility across the service delivery chain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
2 months ago
Option C provides a good balance of responsibilities between ZYXS and ZYXH.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dong
2 months ago
I agree with Gwen, option C seems like the most comprehensive approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwen
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the most effective approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walker
3 months ago
I think the best approach is option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vashti
3 months ago
Option C seems the most logical approach. ZYXS should be responsible for the overall service delivery, while ZYXH monitors their performance and the achievement of strategic objectives. Segregation of duties is key.
upvoted 0 times
Elbert
1 months ago
Segregation of duties is definitely important in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
1 months ago
And ZYXH can then monitor and ensure the expected outcomes are achieved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
2 months ago
I agree, ZYXS should focus on delivering the end-to-end service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billi
2 months ago
Option C seems the most logical approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77