Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks Exam 301a Topic 9 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301a exam
Question #: 88
Topic #: 9
[All 301a Questions]

Six servers have a varying number of connections that change based on the user load.

Which load balancing method should an LTM Specialist apply to divided the web application traffic to the servers on the relative performance trend?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Elden
6 months ago
Predictive? More like 'Predictive Disaster' if you ask me. I bet the developers came up with that one on a coffee break.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
6 months ago
I'm not sure, but Least Sessions might be a bit too simple for this scenario. The user load is changing, so we need something more sophisticated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
6 months ago
Hmm, Ratio could work well too. It can allocate traffic based on the server's capacity, which sounds useful for handling varying user loads.
upvoted 0 times
Frederica
5 months ago
Ratio could work well too. It can allocate traffic based on the server's capacity, which sounds useful for handling varying user loads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
5 months ago
D) Ratio
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
5 months ago
C) Predictive
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
6 months ago
B) Least Connections
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
6 months ago
A) Least Sessions
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sheron
6 months ago
Least Connections seems like a good option to me. It'll spread the load evenly across the servers based on the current number of active connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
6 months ago
I think Predictive load balancing would be the best choice here. It can handle the dynamic user load and distribute traffic based on the server performance.
upvoted 0 times
Brendan
5 months ago
I think Ratio load balancing could also work well to distribute traffic based on the relative performance trend of the servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
5 months ago
I agree, Predictive load balancing would be the most suitable option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beula
5 months ago
C) Predictive
upvoted 0 times
...
Leila
5 months ago
B) Least Connections
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
6 months ago
A) Least Sessions
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
6 months ago
I think Ratio load balancing could also work well in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
6 months ago
I agree, Predictive load balancing would be the most suitable method for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77