Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks Exam 301b Topic 3 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301b exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 3
[All 301b Questions]

-- Exhibit --

-- Exhibit --

Refer to the exhibits.

An LTM Specialist is troubleshooting an issue with one of the virtual servers on an LTM device, and all requests are receiving errors. Testing directly against the server generates no errors. The LTM Specialist has captured the request and response on both client and server sides of the LTM device.

What should the LTM Specialist do to fix this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lai
4 months ago
Ah, the age-old problem of virtual server woes. I'd suggest the LTM Specialist try turning it off and on again. If that doesn't work, they can always blame it on the 'quantum fluctuations' in the network.
upvoted 0 times
Charolette
3 months ago
B) Configure SNAT Automap on the virtual server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
4 months ago
A) Remove 'header-erase Host' in http profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daisy
4 months ago
I'm stumped, but I'm gonna go with option B. SNAT Automap sounds like the kind of magic that could save the day, ya know?
upvoted 0 times
Fannie
3 months ago
I agree with the first user, B seems like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
4 months ago
I'm not so sure about B. Maybe C or D could work better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
4 months ago
I think option B is the way to go too. SNAT Automap might just do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ezekiel
4 months ago
This one's a tough nut to crack, but I reckon option D is the answer. Selective redirect-rewrite could be the key to resolving those pesky client-side errors.
upvoted 0 times
Luke
3 months ago
I agree, Option D seems like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
4 months ago
Maybe we should consider Option C as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
4 months ago
I think Option A might also work in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
4 months ago
Option D sounds like a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aracelis
5 months ago
I think assigning OneConnect profile to the virtual server could be the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
5 months ago
I believe configuring SNAT Automap on the virtual server might also help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
5 months ago
Hold up, I'd say option C is the way to go. Assigning a OneConnect profile should help with the connection pooling and improve the responsiveness.
upvoted 0 times
Marylou
4 months ago
I agree with you, Option C seems like the most appropriate solution in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cortney
4 months ago
Let's go with option C then. It seems like the most appropriate solution for this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
4 months ago
I think Option A might be better. Removing 'header-erase Host' could potentially solve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
4 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It should improve the responsiveness of the virtual server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
4 months ago
Option C sounds like a good idea. OneConnect profile can definitely help with connection pooling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
4 months ago
I think option C is a good choice. OneConnect profile can definitely help with connection pooling.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jessenia
5 months ago
I agree with Hoa, removing 'header-erase Host' could fix the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
5 months ago
I think the LTM Specialist should remove 'header-erase Host' in http profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
5 months ago
Hmm, looks like the issue is related to the HTTP profile. I'd try option A - removing the 'header-erase Host' setting. That might fix the problem.
upvoted 0 times
Clorinda
4 months ago
I agree. Setting 'redirect-rewrite' to 'selective' in the http profile might be worth trying as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
4 months ago
That's true. Assigning OneConnect profile could also improve the connection efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
5 months ago
But what if the issue is with the server-side connection? Maybe configuring SNAT Automap could help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andree
5 months ago
I think option A is a good choice. Removing 'header-erase Host' might solve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77