Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Finra Exam Series-6 Topic 5 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Finra's Series-6 exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 5
[All Series-6 Questions]

Which of the following statements regarding both a Uniform Gifts to Minors account (UGMA) and a Uniform Transfers to Minors account (UTMA) is false?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The false statement regarding both a UGMA and a UTMA is that the assets must be re-registered in the minor child's name when the child turns 18. The rule differs between the two types of accounts. The UGMA requires that the assets must be re-registered when the child reaches the ''age of majority,'' as defined by the state, and the definition differs among states. Under the UTMA, the transfer of the account can be delayed until the minor child has reached the age of 25.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Walker
2 months ago
I'm pretty sure the account has to be established in the name of one minor child only. Trying to sneak in multiple kids would just be asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
Silva
21 days ago
C) Once established, the account is irrevocable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
26 days ago
B) The account must be established in the name of one minor child only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
1 months ago
A) There can be only one custodian named on the account.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herminia
2 months ago
Ha! I bet the custodian wishes they could just keep the money for themselves. But nope, gotta hand it over to the kid. That's the law for ya!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
2 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. Isn't the whole idea of these accounts to transfer assets to the minor child? Wouldn't that mean the assets need to be re-registered in their name eventually?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
2 months ago
Hmm, I think option C is the correct answer here. Once the account is established, it becomes irrevocable. Isn't that the whole point of these types of accounts?
upvoted 0 times
Kenny
1 months ago
D) The assets must be re-registered in the minor child's name when the child turns 18.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
1 months ago
C) Once established, the account is irrevocable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
1 months ago
B) The account must be established in the name of one minor child only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilford
1 months ago
A) There can be only one custodian named on the account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
2 months ago
D) The assets must be re-registered in the minor child's name when the child turns 18.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
2 months ago
B) The account must be established in the name of one minor child only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
2 months ago
A) There can be only one custodian named on the account.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorita
3 months ago
I agree with Reita, the assets don't have to be re-registered at 18. So, the false statement is D).
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the false statement is D) The assets must be re-registered in the minor child's name when the child turns 18.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
3 months ago
I think the false statement is A) There can be only one custodian named on the account.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77