Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam FCSS_NST_SE-7.4 Topic 3 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's FCSS_NST_SE-7.4 exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 3
[All FCSS_NST_SE-7.4 Questions]

Exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit, which shows the output of a diagnose command.

What can you conclude about the debug output in this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Nan
1 months ago
Haha, this question is a real head-scratcher! I'm going to go with option B. There's gotta be a correlation between the FortiGuard-requests and Weight fields, right? That's just basic logic.
upvoted 0 times
Dallas
7 days ago
Definitely, it's all about finding patterns in the data. Option B seems like the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
10 days ago
I agree, it makes sense that there would be a correlation between those two fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
18 days ago
I think you're onto something there. Option B does seem like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Refugia
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. The question mentions 'debug output,' so I'm guessing option D might be correct. Servers with negative TZ values could be less preferred for rating requests.
upvoted 0 times
Delisa
15 days ago
It's possible. The correlation between those values could also be significant in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
21 days ago
But what about the correlation between FortiGuard-requests and Weight values? Could that be a factor as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
23 days ago
I agree, negative TZ values might play a role in server preference for rating requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Destiny
25 days ago
Option D seems like a logical choice. Negative TZ values could indicate less preference for rating requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jenise
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D because servers with negative TZ values are less preferred.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
2 months ago
I think the answer is C. The debug output clearly shows that FortiGate used 64.26.151.37 as the initial server to validate its contract.
upvoted 0 times
Loreen
15 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think D could also be a possibility. Servers with a negative TZ value are less preferred for rating requests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
23 days ago
I see your point, but I think B makes more sense. There is a natural correlation between the value in the FortiGuard-requests field and the value in the Weight field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
30 days ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A. The first server provided to FortiGate when it performed a DNS query looking for a list of rating servers, was 121.111.236.179.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monte
1 months ago
I think the answer is C. The debug output clearly shows that FortiGate used 64.26.151.37 as the initial server to validate its contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devon
2 months ago
I think the answer is A because it mentions the first server used for a DNS query.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77