Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE4_FGT-7.2 Topic 1 Question 21 Discussion

Contribute your Thoughts:

Cassi
8 months ago
Good point. Limiting it to just global application could be a drawback. Though I suppose the trade-off might be easier management if it's a one-size-fits-all kind of deal. Still, flexibility is always nice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
8 months ago
But wait, don't we also need to consider the global vs. VDOM application? I'm not sure about option B. Wouldn't it be better if the policy-based mode could be applied to individual VDOMs as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
8 months ago
I agree, A and D sound like the best options. The policy-based mode seems designed to simplify firewall management by integrating more functionality directly into the policies. That could be a real time-saver for administrators.
upvoted 0 times
Candra
7 months ago
It's possible. Organizations with specific VDOM requirements may find that limitation restrictive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karima
7 months ago
C) NGFW policy-based mode policies support only flow inspection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonell
8 months ago
Do you think the global application limitation could be a drawback for some organizations?
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
8 months ago
B) NGFW policy-based mode can only be applied globally and not on individual VDOMs
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
8 months ago
I think you're right. Having those features integrated into the policies does seem like a time-saver.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
8 months ago
D) NGFW policy-based mode supports creating applications and web filtering categories directly in a firewall policy
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
8 months ago
A) NGFW policy-based mode does not require the use of central source NAT policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Desmond
8 months ago
Hmm, this NGFW policy-based mode question seems a bit tricky. I'm not entirely sure about the specifics, but I'm leaning towards options A and D. The 'no central source NAT policy' and the ability to create applications and web filtering directly in the policy sound like useful features.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77