Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE4_FGT-7.2 Topic 6 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE4_FGT-7.2 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 6
[All NSE4_FGT-7.2 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

In the network shown in the exhibit, the web client cannot connect to the HTTP web server. The administrator runs the FortiGate built-in sniffer and gets the output as shown in the exhibit.

What should the administrator do next to troubleshoot the problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jacquelyne
6 months ago
What about running a sniffer on the web server itself?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
6 months ago
I agree with Lindsay. Running another sniffer in the FortiGate with the filter host 10.0.1.10 could give more specific information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
6 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to capture the traffic using an external sniffer connected to port1?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsay
6 months ago
I think the administrator should execute another sniffer in the FortiGate with the filter host 10.0.1.10.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
6 months ago
I think executing a debug flow would be the best approach to troubleshoot the problem thoroughly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
7 months ago
I agree with Murray, running another sniffer in the FortiGate with the filter host 10.0.1.10 might provide more insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
7 months ago
I disagree, I believe capturing the traffic using an external sniffer connected to port1 would be more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Murray
7 months ago
I think we should run a sniffer on the web server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
8 months ago
Yeah, I'm with you on that one. And hey, if that doesn't work, maybe we can try option D and do a debug flow. That could shed some light on the problem, although it might be a bit more technical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
8 months ago
I dunno, man. I'm leaning towards option C - executing another sniffer with the filter host 10.0.1.10. That could give us some more insight into what's going on with that specific IP address, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Tanja
7 months ago
Actually, I'm starting to agree with you. Executing another sniffer with the filter host 10.0.1.10 seems like a good idea now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
7 months ago
C
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
7 months ago
I see your point, but I still think capturing the traffic using an external sniffer connected to port1 is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
8 months ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
8 months ago
No way, I disagree. The best approach would be to execute a debug flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
8 months ago
D
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
8 months ago
I think option A might be better, we should run a sniffer on the web server directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malika
8 months ago
A
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felix
8 months ago
Okay, let's break this down. The administrator's already run the FortiGate sniffer and got some output, but it doesn't seem to be solving the issue. I think we need to dig deeper here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
8 months ago
Whoa, this question is intense! I mean, the exhibit looks like a network diagram, and the issue is that the web client can't connect to the HTTP server. Talk about a headache-inducing problem!
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77