Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE5_FMG-7.2 Topic 4 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE5_FMG-7.2 exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 4
[All NSE5_FMG-7.2 Questions]

What is the purpose of the Policy Check feature on FortiManager?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lorrine
2 months ago
Option B all the way! Combining similar policy packages into one? That's like the policy version of KonMari-ing your closet. Sparking joy, one policy at a time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Maybe I should just flip a coin? Or maybe I should just ask the FortiManager to do the policy check for me - it's probably better at this than I am.
upvoted 0 times
Oliva
1 months ago
User1: That's a good point. Let's go with option C then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haley
1 months ago
User3: Why not let the FortiManager do the policy check for you? It's probably better at this than we are.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
1 months ago
User2: I believe it's actually to find and provide recommendation for optimizing policies in a policy package.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
2 months ago
I think the purpose of the Policy Check feature is to find and merge duplicate policies in the policy package.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rebecka
3 months ago
I'm going to have to go with option D. Merging duplicate objects and creating dynamic mappings? That's like policy Tetris, and I'm here for it!
upvoted 0 times
Jaime
2 months ago
I see your point, but I still think option D is the way to go. Deleting disabled firewall policies can help clean up the policy package.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
2 months ago
I agree with you, but I'm leaning towards option C. Optimizing policies in a policy package can really improve efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. Combining multiple separate policy packages into one common package can really streamline things.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annmarie
3 months ago
I think it might also merge and create dynamic mappings for duplicate objects in a policy package.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
3 months ago
I believe it also compares the policy packages with the revision history and updates them in the ADOM database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Broderick
3 months ago
Option A looks good to me. I mean, who doesn't love some policy optimization recommendations? It's like having a personal policy coach on your team.
upvoted 0 times
Colene
3 months ago
Yes, it's like having a personal policy coach guiding you through the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
3 months ago
I agree, having recommendations for optimizing policies is really helpful.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amalia
3 months ago
I agree with Claribel, it makes sense to have a feature that helps optimize policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
4 months ago
The Policy Check feature sounds like it can really help streamline our policy management. I'm going to go with option B, since that seems to be the most comprehensive solution for optimizing our policy packages.
upvoted 0 times
Aleta
2 months ago
Let's go with option B then, it seems like the most comprehensive solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
3 months ago
I agree, it will definitely help streamline our policy management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
3 months ago
Yeah, combining similar policy packages into one sounds efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiera
3 months ago
I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Claribel
4 months ago
I think the purpose of the Policy Check feature is to provide recommendations for optimizing policies in a policy package.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77