Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE6_FAC-6.4 Topic 1 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FAC-6.4 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 1
[All NSE6_FAC-6.4 Questions]

You are the administrator of a global enterprise with three FortiAuthenticator devices. You would like to deploy them to provide active-passive HA at headquarters, with geographically distributed load balancing.

What would the role settings be?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

To deploy three FortiAuthenticator devices to provide active-passive HA at headquarters, with geographically distributed load balancing, the role settings would be:

One standalone primary, which acts as the master device for HA and load balancing

One cluster member, which acts as the backup device for HA and load balancing

One load balancer, which acts as a remote device that forwards authentication requests to the primary or cluster member device


Contribute your Thoughts:

Gracia
6 months ago
I think having one standalone primary, one cluster member, and one load balancer would be the best option for both redundancy and load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Farrah
6 months ago
But wouldn't having two cluster members provide better redundancy in case one fails?
upvoted 0 times
...
Adaline
6 months ago
I disagree. I think the role settings should be one standalone primary, one cluster member, and one load balancer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
6 months ago
I agree with Farrah. Having two cluster members for redundancy and a load balancer for distributed load balancing makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Farrah
6 months ago
I think the role settings should be two cluster members and one load balancer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
6 months ago
But having a backup device in the mix could also enhance the HA setup. So, maybe option C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
7 months ago
I feel like having one standalone primary, one cluster member, and one load balancer might provide better redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
7 months ago
I agree with Trina. Having two cluster members ensures high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
7 months ago
I think the role settings should be two cluster members and one load balancer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
8 months ago
Yeah, I agree with Edda. Option B seems like the best fit for the requirements. Although, I have to admit, I'm a little worried about the cluster member. What if it goes down? Wouldn't that mess up the whole setup?
upvoted 0 times
Maybelle
7 months ago
Overall, ensuring proper configuration and monitoring of the HA setup will be key to its success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tesha
7 months ago
That's a good point, having redundancy measures in place is crucial for high availability setups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
8 months ago
Perhaps implementing a failover mechanism for the cluster member could help mitigate any potential issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olen
8 months ago
In that case, having a backup plan in place would be essential to ensure smooth operation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
8 months ago
I understand your concern about the cluster member going down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
8 months ago
I agree, having one standalone primary, one cluster member, and one load balancer should provide the required setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamie
8 months ago
Option B seems like the best fit for the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edda
8 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense. We have one standalone primary, one cluster member, and one load balancer. That way we have the active-passive HA setup, and the load balancer to handle the geographic distribution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
8 months ago
Okay, let's break this down. We need to have active-passive HA at headquarters, with geographically distributed load balancing. That means we need a primary and a backup, as well as some load balancing capability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
8 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward, but I'm not sure about the specifics of FortiAuthenticator and HA configurations. I'm leaning towards either B or D, but I need to think it through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77