Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE6_FAC-6.4 Topic 4 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FAC-6.4 exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 4
[All NSE6_FAC-6.4 Questions]

Which method is the most secure way of delivering FortiToken data once the token has been seeded?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Online activation of the tokens through the FortiGuard network is the most secure way of delivering FortiToken data once the token has been seeded because it eliminates the risk of seed files being compromised during transit or storage. The other methods involve physical or manual delivery of seed files which can be intercepted, lost, or stolen. Reference: https://docs.fortinet.com/document/fortiauthenticator/6.4/administration-guide/372403/fortitoken


Contribute your Thoughts:

Joesph
5 months ago
I see your point. Option B seems to be the safest way to ensure data confidentiality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
5 months ago
True, but convenience should not compromise security. That's why I prefer option B as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
5 months ago
But what about option D? Automatic token generation sounds convenient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
5 months ago
I agree, shipping on a CD in a tamper-evident envelope minimizes the risk of interception.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
6 months ago
I think option B is the most secure way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
7 months ago
But wouldn't automatic token generation using FortiAuthenticator be more convenient and secure?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
7 months ago
I prefer using the in-house token provisioning tool for added security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
7 months ago
I disagree, I believe online activation of the tokens through the FortiGuard network is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
7 months ago
I think the most secure way is shipping the seed files on a CD using a tamper-evident envelope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
8 months ago
That's true, Shannan. And we all know how easy it is for physical media to get lost or damaged in transit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
8 months ago
Oooh, what about the automatic token generation using FortiAuthenticator? That sounds like the most hands-off and streamlined option. Plus, you know the folks at Fortinet have thought this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
8 months ago
Online activation? Really? I don't know, that sounds a bit sketchy to me. I'd feel more comfortable using the in-house token provisioning tool. At least that way, we have more control over the process.
upvoted 0 times
Viola
6 months ago
True, but security should be the top priority when it comes to delivering FortiToken data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
6 months ago
I think online activation through the FortiGuard network is convenient, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
6 months ago
But what about the option of shipment of the seed files on a CD using a tamper-evident envelope?
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
7 months ago
I agree, using the in-house token provisioning tool seems more secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jina
8 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. Shipping physical media seems a bit outdated these days. I'd go with the online activation through the FortiGuard network. It's more convenient and probably just as secure, if not more so.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
8 months ago
The tamper-evident envelope for shipping the seed files on a CD sounds more secure, but it might be a bit of a hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
8 months ago
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. The network connection could be a potential vulnerability.
upvoted 0 times
Amber
7 months ago
I think that's a wise choice, maintaining control over the process is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
7 months ago
So, the best option might be to use the in-house token provisioning tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cary
8 months ago
Agreed, the network connection could indeed be a potential vulnerability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
8 months ago
D) Automatic token generation using FortiAuthenticator could be efficient but may pose security risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
8 months ago
C) Using the in-house token provisioning tool allows for full control over the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
8 months ago
B) Shipment of the seed files on a CD using a tamper-evident envelope is a more secure option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
8 months ago
A) Online activation of the tokens through the FortiGuard network is convenient but may not be secure enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ling
8 months ago
Hmm, this question seems to be testing our understanding of the different methods for delivering FortiToken data. I think the most secure option would be to use a tamper-evident envelope to ship the seed files on a CD. That way, you can be sure the data hasn't been tampered with during transit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnee
8 months ago
Online activation through the FortiGuard network seems like the easiest option, but I'm not sure how secure it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosenda
8 months ago
I agree, Elliot. Delivering FortiToken data securely is crucial, especially since it's related to authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
8 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. Security is definitely the top priority here, so we need to carefully consider the options.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77