Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE6_FAC-6.4 Topic 5 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FAC-6.4 exam

Question #: 20
Topic #: 5

[All NSE6_FAC-6.4 Questions]

Which two protocols are the default management access protocols for administrative access for FortiAuthenticator? (Choose two)

ATelnet

BHTTPS

CSSH

DSNMP

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

To deploy three FortiAuthenticator devices to provide active-passive HA at headquarters, with geographically distributed load balancing, the role settings would be:

One standalone primary, which acts as the master device for HA and load balancing

One cluster member, which acts as the backup device for HA and load balancing

One load balancer, which acts as a remote device that forwards authentication requests to the primary or cluster member device

by Royal at Apr 22, 2024, 07:06 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE6_FAC-6.4 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lajuana

1 months ago

Telnet? Really? I might as well just shout my passwords out the window. HTTPS and SSH all the way, baby. And SNMP? That's like trying to herd cats, but with more acronyms.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cheryl

1 months ago

Ooh, HTTPS and SSH, the dynamic duo of secure admin access. Telnet? What is this, a bad spy movie? And SNMP? That's for the guys who love graphs and charts more than actual security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Levi

2 months ago

Ah, the classic HTTPS and SSH combo. Can't go wrong with those. Telnet? Only if I want my passwords to be as secure as a paper bag. And SNMP? That's for the network geeks, not us admins.

upvoted 0 times

Roselle

7 days ago

Absolutely, HTTPS and SSH are the standard for secure administrative access. Telnet is just too risky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eladia

15 days ago

Telnet is definitely a no-go, too insecure. SNMP is more for monitoring, not admin access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Romana

16 days ago

SNMP is more for monitoring, not really for admin access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denae

17 days ago

Telnet is definitely a no-go for security reasons.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

20 days ago

I agree, HTTPS and SSH are the way to go for secure access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willard

1 months ago

I agree, HTTPS and SSH are the way to go for secure management access.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Cristen

2 months ago

HTTPS and SSH, easy peasy. Telnet? What is this, the 90s? And SNMP? Nah, that's more for network monitoring, not admin access.

upvoted 0 times

Odette

5 days ago

SNMP is definitely not for admin access, it's more for monitoring network devices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caprice

20 days ago

I agree, Telnet is outdated. HTTPS and SSH are the way to go for secure admin access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Teddy

21 days ago

Yeah, Telnet is definitely not the way to go. HTTPS and SSH are much better options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katie

1 months ago

Telnet? Seriously? That's not secure at all.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Nenita

2 months ago

Hmm, Telnet? Really? That's like using a carrier pigeon to send encrypted messages. I'll go with HTTPS and SSH for sure.

upvoted 0 times

Chan

1 months ago

Yeah, Telnet is outdated. HTTPS and SSH are the way to go for secure management access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gilberto

1 months ago

Telnet is definitely not secure, I agree. I always go with HTTPS and SSH.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Irene

3 months ago

I'm not sure about SNMP, but I know Telnet is not secure, so I would go with HTTPS and SSH.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noemi

3 months ago

I agree with Mirta, HTTPS and SSH are more secure options for administrative access.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mirta

3 months ago

I think the default management access protocols for FortiAuthenticator are HTTPS and SSH.

upvoted 0 times

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77