Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE6_FAZ-7.2 Topic 2 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FAZ-7.2 exam
Question #: 3
Topic #: 2
[All NSE6_FAZ-7.2 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Based on the partial outputs displayed in the exhibit, which devices are ready to be configured as peers in an HA cluster?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Based on the provided exhibit, which shows partial outputs of the system status and global settings for FortiAnalyzer devices, the devices cannot be configured as peers in an HA (High Availability) cluster. This is indicated by the HA Mode status being set to 'Stand Alone' for the displayed FortiAnalyzer device. For devices to be part of an HA cluster, they would need to have compatible HA configurations, and usually, they should not be in 'Stand Alone' mode. Additionally, the exhibit only shows information for one FortiAnalyzer, so it cannot be determined if there is another device ready to form an HA cluster with it.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Josphine
6 months ago
Based on the exhibit, I think FortiAnalyzer2 and FortiAnalyzer3 could also be potential peers in the HA cluster. So, my vote is for option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
6 months ago
I think option C is not valid because it says these devices cannot participate in the same cluster. So, it's either A, B, or D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carli
6 months ago
But can we rule out the other options? Maybe we should reconsider all the possibilities before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
6 months ago
I agree with Florinda. FortiAnalyzer1 and FortiAnalyzer2 seems like the right pair based on the exhibit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
6 months ago
Yes, it seems that way. I believe the correct answer is option B, FortiAnalyzer1 and FortiAnalyzer2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
6 months ago
I think the question is about configuring HA cluster with FortiAnalyzer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
7 months ago
Got it, thanks for the clarification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
7 months ago
That makes sense. So the correct answer is B) FortiAnalyzer1 and FortiAnalyzer2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
7 months ago
I see your point, but the exhibit only shows FortiAnalyzer1 and FortiAnalyzer2 as having the status 'HA ready'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
7 months ago
But what about FortiAnalyzer3? I think it can also be configured as a peer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
7 months ago
I agree, because they both show the 'HA ready' status in the exhibit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
7 months ago
I think the answer is B) FortiAnalyzer1 and FortiAnalyzer2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
8 months ago
Ooh, good catch! I was leaning towards that as well. The outputs seem to indicate that those two devices are in a matching state, which suggests they could be paired up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moira
8 months ago
Alright, let's take a look. Based on the information provided, I think B) FortiAnalyzer1 and FortiAnalyzer2 are the devices that can be configured as peers in an HA cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
8 months ago
I agree, this is a bit of a head-scratcher. Let's see what the options are and see if we can figure out the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
8 months ago
Hmm, this question seems tricky. The partial outputs don't give us the full picture, so we really need to analyze the details carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Paris
7 months ago
Yes, B makes more sense after looking at it again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabine
7 months ago
B) FortiAnalyzer1 and FortiAnalyzer2
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
7 months ago
Hmm, we need to carefully compare the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
7 months ago
A) FortiAnalyzer1 and FortiAnalyzer3
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
7 months ago
I don't think C is correct based on the exhibit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
7 months ago
C) These devices cannot participate in the same cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
7 months ago
I agree, let's go with B.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
8 months ago
B) FortiAnalyzer1 and FortiAnalyzer2
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
8 months ago
I'm leaning towards D, but let's double-check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
8 months ago
D) FortiAnalyzer2 and FortiAnalyzer3
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassandra
8 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
8 months ago
A) FortiAnalyzer1 and FortiAnalyzer2
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77