Fortinet Exam NSE6_FML-7.2 Topic 4 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FML-7.2 exam

Question #: 16
Topic #: 4

[All NSE6_FML-7.2 Questions]

What are two disadvantages of configuring the dictionary and DLP scan rule aggressiveness too high? (Choose two.)

AHigh aggressiveness scan settings do not support executable file types.

BIt is more resource intensive

CMore false positives could be detected.

DFortiMail requires more disk space for the additional rules.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, C

by Martina at Mar 21, 2024, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE6_FML-7.2 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lorrie

5 months ago

That's a good point. It can be time-consuming to sort through false positives.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dannette

5 months ago

Also, configuring the aggressiveness too high can lead to more false positives being detected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jill

6 months ago

Yes, that's true. More resources could be used up.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

6 months ago

Another disadvantage is that it is more resource intensive.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ivette

6 months ago

I agree, that could be a problem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

6 months ago

I think one disadvantage is that high aggressiveness scan settings do not support executable file types.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ona

6 months ago

That's true, Lashaun. Configuring the aggressiveness too high can indeed lead to more disk space being used up by FortiMail.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashaun

6 months ago

But wouldn't it also require more disk space for additional rules? That could be a disadvantage too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Omer

7 months ago

I agree with Maxima. High aggressiveness settings can increase the chances of false positives, which can be a hassle to deal with.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maxima

7 months ago

I think configuring the dictionary and DLP scan rule aggressiveness too high can lead to more false positives being detected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosio

8 months ago

I'm curious about the 'no executable file types' part. Does that mean the high aggressiveness settings can't even scan those types of files? That seems like a pretty significant limitation.

upvoted 0 times

Corinne

7 months ago

D) FortiMail requires more disk space for the additional rules.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lazaro

8 months ago

True, it can put a strain on system resources.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joye

8 months ago

B) It is more resource intensive

upvoted 0 times

...

Edwin

8 months ago

Yes, that's correct. High aggressiveness settings focus more on text-based content.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marjory

8 months ago

C) More false positives could be detected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaime

8 months ago

A) High aggressiveness scan settings do not support executable file types.

upvoted 0 times

...

I'm not too worried about the disk space requirement. Disks are pretty cheap these days, so that doesn't seem like a major issue. But the other two points are definitely valid concerns. We need to find the right balance between security and performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mammie

8 months ago

Haha, yeah, that's a bit concerning. Imagine trying to explain to the boss why your antivirus can't even check the company's own executable files. 'Sorry, our security is too good for that!'

upvoted 0 times

...

Na

8 months ago

Hmm, this is an interesting question. I think the key disadvantages are the increased resource usage and the risk of more false positives. We don't want the system to be bogged down, and we definitely don't want to be drowning in false alerts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fortinet Exam NSE6_FML-7.2 Topic 4 Question 16 Discussion

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lorrie

Dannette

Jill

Paris

Ivette

Mitsue

Ona

Lashaun

Omer

Maxima

Rosio

Corinne

Lazaro

Joye

Edwin

Marjory

Jaime

Orville

Mammie

Na