Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE6_FNC-7.2 Topic 1 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FNC-7.2 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 1
[All NSE6_FNC-7.2 Questions]

An administrator is configuring FortiNAC to manage FortiGate VPN users. As part of the configuration, the administrator must configure a few FortiGate firewall policies.

What is the purpose of the FortiGate firewall policy that applies to unauthorized VPN clients?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Heidy
2 months ago
I'm gonna go with B. Seems like the most straightforward way to manage access for unauthorized VPN clients.
upvoted 0 times
Kimberlie
1 months ago
User 3: Definitely. B seems like the most secure option in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
1 months ago
User 2: I agree. It's important to restrict access for unauthorized users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
1 months ago
I think B is the right choice. It makes sense to allow access to only the FortiNAC VPN interface for unauthorized VPN clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ardella
2 months ago
But wouldn't it also make sense to allow access to only the FortiNAC VPN interface for authorized users?
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
2 months ago
Gotta be A. Keeping those unauthorized clients away from the production DNS server is a must-do for network security.
upvoted 0 times
Meaghan
1 months ago
User 3: Agreed, keeping them away from critical servers is crucial for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
1 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. We definitely don't want unauthorized clients messing with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
1 months ago
I think the purpose is to deny access to the production DNS server.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sabina
2 months ago
I agree with Temeka. It makes sense to deny access to unauthorized users to protect the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
2 months ago
D seems more logical to me. Denying access to the FortiNAC VPN interface would be the appropriate action for unauthorized clients.
upvoted 0 times
Leslie
28 days ago
I see your point. It's important to consider the most secure option when configuring firewall policies for VPN users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
1 months ago
That's true, but denying access to the FortiNAC VPN interface would be more effective in preventing unauthorized access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
1 months ago
But wouldn't allowing access to only the production DNS server also be a valid option to restrict unauthorized clients?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
1 months ago
I agree, denying access to the FortiNAC VPN interface would prevent unauthorized clients from accessing the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Temeka
3 months ago
I think the purpose is to deny access to unauthorized VPN clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is B. It makes sense to allow access only to the FortiNAC VPN interface for unauthorized clients.
upvoted 0 times
Sommer
2 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. It's important to restrict access for unauthorized clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77