Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE6_FNC-7.2 Topic 3 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FNC-7.2 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 3
[All NSE6_FNC-7.2 Questions]

What would occur if both an unknown (rogue) device and a known (trusted) device simultaneously appeared on a port that is a member of the Forced Registration port group?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Karan
2 months ago
Why do you think it's A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
2 months ago
Hold up, are we sure there's not a secret option E where the port explodes and we all get the day off? No? Darn, guess I'll have to settle for one of these boring choices then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
2 months ago
I don't know, man. Option A seems kinda sketchy to me. Letting both hosts have access to the VLAN? That's just asking for trouble. I'm going to have to pass on that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
2 months ago
I'm going with option D. The port would be administratively shut down. Better safe than sorry, I always say! No unknown devices on my watch!
upvoted 0 times
Marsha
2 months ago
I think we should consult the network administrator to be sure of the correct action to take.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
2 months ago
I see your point, but I still think option D is the safest bet. Shutting down the port is better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the correct choice. Both hosts would be isolated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
2 months ago
I think option A is more likely. Both hosts would have access to that VLAN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
2 months ago
I'm sticking with option D. Shutting down the port is the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
2 months ago
I agree with option B. An event would be generated if both devices appeared.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
2 months ago
I think option A is more likely. Both hosts would have access to that VLAN.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malcolm
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
3 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option B sounds like a reasonable approach too, where the port is not managed, and an event is generated. It's important to be proactive about unknown devices on the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
3 months ago
I think option C is the correct answer. The port would be provisioned to the registration network, and both hosts would be isolated. This is the most logical response to protect the network from an unknown device.
upvoted 0 times
Dalene
1 months ago
True, it's better to err on the side of caution when dealing with unknown devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
2 months ago
I think in this case, isolating both hosts is the safer option to prevent any security risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
2 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice to isolate both hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
2 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to provision the port for the normal state host?
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77