Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE6_FSW-7.2 Topic 4 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FSW-7.2 exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 4
[All NSE6_FSW-7.2 Questions]

What can an administrator do to maintain a FortiGate-compatible FortiSwitch configuration when changing the management mode from standalone to FortiLinK?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Germaine
2 months ago
Wait, we have a FortiLink option? I thought this was a FortiGate exam. *chuckles nervously* Anyway, Option B sounds like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Johnna
13 days ago
User 4: Definitely, it's important to ensure compatibility when changing management modes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
14 days ago
User 3: Enabling FortiLink setting on FortiSwitch before the authorization process sounds like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
15 days ago
User 2: I didn't know that either. Option B does seem like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
21 days ago
User 1: Yeah, we do have a FortiLink option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
1 months ago
User 3: Enabling FortiLink setting on FortiSwitch before authorization process is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
1 months ago
I agree, Option B seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
1 months ago
Yeah, we do have a FortiLink option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elizabeth
2 months ago
Option D is an interesting idea, but registering the FortiSwitch to the cloud seems like an extra step. I'd stick with the classic FortiLink approach in Option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
2 months ago
As an administrator, I'd rather not rely on a Python script to convert the configuration. Option B sounds more straightforward and reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
2 months ago
Option C seems like the easiest solution, but I'm not sure if FortiGate really saves the existing configuration during the FortiLink process. Better to be safe and go with Option B.
upvoted 0 times
Jutta
25 days ago
I'm going to go with Option B just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
29 days ago
I agree, using a migration tool based on Python script sounds like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cruz
1 months ago
Well, it's always better to be safe than sorry. Option B it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbeca
1 months ago
I think Option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that, I think using a migration tool based on Python script might be more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
2 months ago
I agree, enabling FortiLink setting on FortiSwitch first seems like a safe bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
2 months ago
I think Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Louann
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think enabling the FortiLink setting on FortiSwitch before the authorization process could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madelyn
3 months ago
I agree with Royce. Using a migration tool would ensure compatibility between FortiGate and FortiSwitch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
3 months ago
I think Option B is the correct answer. Enabling FortiLink on the FortiSwitch before the authorization process is crucial for maintaining compatibility.
upvoted 0 times
Arlyne
2 months ago
Registering FortiSwitch to FortiSwitch Cloud to save a copy before managing with FortiGate could be a good backup plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
2 months ago
FortiGate automatically saving the existing FortiSwitch configuration during the FortiLink management process is convenient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latricia
2 months ago
But I think using a migration tool based on Python script to convert the configuration is also a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
2 months ago
I agree, enabling FortiLink on the FortiSwitch before authorization is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Royce
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) Use a migration tool based on Python script to convert the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77